↓ Skip to main content

The Microcephalin Ancestral Allele in a Neanderthal Individual

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Microcephalin Ancestral Allele in a Neanderthal Individual
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010648
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martina Lari, Ermanno Rizzi, Lucio Milani, Giorgio Corti, Carlotta Balsamo, Stefania Vai, Giulio Catalano, Elena Pilli, Laura Longo, Silvana Condemi, Paolo Giunti, Catherine Hänni, Gianluca De Bellis, Ludovic Orlando, Guido Barbujani, David Caramelli

Abstract

The high frequency (around 0.70 worldwide) and the relatively young age (between 14,000 and 62,000 years) of a derived group of haplotypes, haplogroup D, at the microcephalin (MCPH1) locus led to the proposal that haplogroup D originated in a human lineage that separated from modern humans >1 million years ago, evolved under strong positive selection, and passed into the human gene pool by an episode of admixture circa 37,000 years ago. The geographic distribution of haplogroup D, with marked differences between Africa and Eurasia, suggested that the archaic human form admixing with anatomically modern humans might have been Neanderthal. Here we report the first PCR amplification and high-throughput sequencing of nuclear DNA at the microcephalin (MCPH1) locus from Neanderthal individual from Mezzena Rockshelter (Monti Lessini, Italy). We show that a well-preserved Neanderthal fossil dated at approximately 50,000 years B.P., was homozygous for the ancestral, non-D, allele. The high yield of Neanderthal mtDNA sequences of the studied specimen, the pattern of nucleotide misincorporation among sequences consistent with post-mortem DNA damage and an accurate control of the MCPH1 alleles in all personnel that manipulated the sample, make it extremely unlikely that this result might reflect modern DNA contamination. The MCPH1 genotype of the Monti Lessini (MLS) Neanderthal does not prove that there was no interbreeding between anatomically archaic and modern humans in Europe, but certainly shows that speculations on a possible Neanderthal origin of what is now the most common MCPH1 haplogroup are not supported by empirical evidence from ancient DNA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 92 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 45%
Arts and Humanities 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 10 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,866,002
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#24,093
of 193,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,672
of 95,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#110
of 694 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 694 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.