↓ Skip to main content

Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, June 2009
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s5691
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monali Bhosle, Joshua S Benner, Mitch DeKoven, Jeff Shelton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2017.
All research outputs
#5,596,984
of 25,899,121 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#406
of 1,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,124
of 127,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,899,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.