You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Science-policy interfaces for biodiversity: dynamic learning environments for successful impact
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1155-1 |
| Authors |
Rob Tinch, Estelle Balian, Dave Carss, Driss Ezzine de Blas, Nicoleta Adriana Geamana, Ulrich Heink, Hans Keune, Carsten Nesshöver, Jari Niemelä, Simo Sarkki, Maxime Thibon, Johannes Timaeus, Angheluta Vadineanu, Sybille van den Hove, Allan Watt, Kerry A. Waylen, Heidi Wittmer, Juliette C. Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| South Africa | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 36 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,664,819
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#384
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,402
of 374,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#9
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.