The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Regulation and the Fate of Personalized Medicine?
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.8.pfor1-1208 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dov Greenbaum |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 20% |
Student > Master | 3 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 3 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 13% |
Philosophy | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2024.
All research outputs
#15,894,919
of 26,564,146 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#2,077
of 2,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,373
of 180,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#21
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,564,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.