↓ Skip to main content

Differentially Expressed RNA from Public Microarray Data Identifies Serum Protein Biomarkers for Cross-Organ Transplant Rejection and Other Conditions

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
patent
17 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differentially Expressed RNA from Public Microarray Data Identifies Serum Protein Biomarkers for Cross-Organ Transplant Rejection and Other Conditions
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000940
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rong Chen, Tara K. Sigdel, Li Li, Neeraja Kambham, Joel T. Dudley, Szu-chuan Hsieh, R. Bryan Klassen, Amery Chen, Tuyen Caohuu, Alexander A. Morgan, Hannah A. Valantine, Kiran K. Khush, Minnie M. Sarwal, Atul J. Butte

Abstract

Serum proteins are routinely used to diagnose diseases, but are hard to find due to low sensitivity in screening the serum proteome. Public repositories of microarray data, such as the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), contain RNA expression profiles for more than 16,000 biological conditions, covering more than 30% of United States mortality. We hypothesized that genes coding for serum- and urine-detectable proteins, and showing differential expression of RNA in disease-damaged tissues would make ideal diagnostic protein biomarkers for those diseases. We showed that predicted protein biomarkers are significantly enriched for known diagnostic protein biomarkers in 22 diseases, with enrichment significantly higher in diseases for which at least three datasets are available. We then used this strategy to search for new biomarkers indicating acute rejection (AR) across different types of transplanted solid organs. We integrated three biopsy-based microarray studies of AR from pediatric renal, adult renal and adult cardiac transplantation and identified 45 genes upregulated in all three. From this set, we chose 10 proteins for serum ELISA assays in 39 renal transplant patients, and discovered three that were significantly higher in AR. Interestingly, all three proteins were also significantly higher during AR in the 63 cardiac transplant recipients studied. Our best marker, serum PECAM1, identified renal AR with 89% sensitivity and 75% specificity, and also showed increased expression in AR by immunohistochemistry in renal, hepatic and cardiac transplant biopsies. Our results demonstrate that integrating gene expression microarray measurements from disease samples and even publicly-available data sets can be a powerful, fast, and cost-effective strategy for the discovery of new diagnostic serum protein biomarkers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Germany 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 138 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Student > Master 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 11%
Computer Science 8 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,512,796
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,268
of 9,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,950
of 106,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#5
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.