You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can a disease-specific education program augment self-management skills and improve Health-Related Quality of Life in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-7-90 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard H Osborne, Rachelle Buchbinder, Ilana N Ackerman |
| Abstract |
Patient education and self-management programs are offered in many countries to people with chronic conditions such as osteoarthritis (OA). The most well-known is the disease-specific Stanford Arthritis Self-Management Program (ASMP). While Australian and international clinical guidelines promote the concept of self-management for OA, there is currently little evidence to support the use of the ASMP. Several meta-analyses have reported that arthritis self-management programs had minimal or no effect on reducing pain and disability. However, previous studies have had methodological shortcomings including the use of outcome measures which do not accurately reflect program goals. Additionally, limited cost-effectiveness analyses have been undertaken and the cost-utility of the program has not been explored. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 18% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 21% |
| Unknown | 46 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 14% |
| Psychology | 15 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2011.
All research outputs
#20,165,369
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,609
of 4,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,811
of 155,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.