↓ Skip to main content

Inappropriateness of Medication Prescriptions to Elderly Patients in the Primary Care Setting: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
83 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
208 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inappropriateness of Medication Prescriptions to Elderly Patients in the Primary Care Setting: A Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0043617
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dedan Opondo, Saied Eslami, Stefan Visscher, Sophia E. de Rooij, Robert Verheij, Joke C. Korevaar, Ameen Abu-Hanna

Abstract

Inappropriate medication prescription is a common cause of preventable adverse drug events among elderly persons in the primary care setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 276 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 13%
Student > Master 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Other 22 8%
Other 70 24%
Unknown 61 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 41 14%
Psychology 9 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 74 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#317,943
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,513
of 225,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,510
of 190,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#54
of 4,345 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,345 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.