You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Role of the Multiple Banded Antigen of Ureaplasma parvum in Intra-Amniotic Infection: Major Virulence Factor or Decoy?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0029856 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha J. Dando, Ilias Nitsos, Suhas G. Kallapur, John P. Newnham, Graeme R. Polglase, J. Jane Pillow, Alan H. Jobe, Peter Timms, Christine L. Knox |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 25% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#118,148
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,062
of 252,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,196
of 3,227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.