↓ Skip to main content

Cryo‐electron tomography: methodology, developments and biological applications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Microscopy, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryo‐electron tomography: methodology, developments and biological applications
Published in
Journal of Microscopy, December 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03478.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. VANHECKE, S. ASANO, Z. KOCHOVSKI, R. FERNANDEZ‐BUSNADIEGO, N. SCHROD, W. BAUMEISTER, V. LUČIĆ

Abstract

Cryo-electron tomography allows three-dimensional visualization of frozen-hydrated, vitrified biological material at molecular resolution. Here, we summarize the most important sample preparation methods and technical aspects relevant for cryo-electron tomography, as well as its recent biological applications from isolated macromolecular complexes to entire cells and tissues.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 3%
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 112 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Student > Master 8 7%
Professor 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 17%
Physics and Astronomy 10 8%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Materials Science 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 15 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2011.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microscopy
#1,852
of 1,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,152
of 192,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microscopy
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,898 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.