↓ Skip to main content

Oligomeric ferrocene rings

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Chemistry, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
64 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Oligomeric ferrocene rings
Published in
Nature Chemistry, September 2016
DOI 10.1038/nchem.2553
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael S. Inkpen, Stefan Scheerer, Michael Linseis, Andrew J.P. White, Rainer F. Winter, Tim Albrecht, Nicholas J. Long, Inkpen, Michael S, Scheerer, Stefan, Linseis, Michael, White, Andrew J P, Winter, Rainer F, Albrecht, Tim, Long, Nicholas J, Andrew J. P. White

Abstract

Cyclic oligomers comprising strongly interacting redox-active monomer units represent an unknown, yet highly desirable class of nanoscale materials. Here we describe the synthesis and properties of the first family of molecules belonging to this compound category-differently sized rings comprising only 1,1'-disubstituted ferrocene units (cyclo[n], n = 5-7, 9). Due to the close proximity and connectivity of centres (covalent Cp-Cp linkages; Cp = cyclopentadienyl) solution voltammograms exhibit well-resolved, separated 1e(-) waves. Theoretical interrogations into correlations based on ring size and charge state are facilitated using values of the equilibrium potentials of these transitions, as well as their relative spacing. As the interaction free energies between the redox centres scale linearly with overall ring charge and in conjunction with fast intramolecular electron transfer (∼10(7) s(-1)), these molecules can be considered as uniformly charged nanorings (diameter ∼1-2 nm).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 29%
Researcher 23 25%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Unspecified 6 6%
Other 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 70 75%
Physics and Astronomy 10 11%
Unspecified 8 9%
Engineering 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 2 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2016.
All research outputs
#160,717
of 12,523,303 outputs
Outputs from Nature Chemistry
#148
of 2,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,824
of 260,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Chemistry
#19
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,523,303 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.