↓ Skip to main content

Low Socioeconomic Status Is Associated with Prolonged Times to Assessment and Treatment, Sepsis and Infectious Death in Pediatric Fever in El Salvador

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low Socioeconomic Status Is Associated with Prolonged Times to Assessment and Treatment, Sepsis and Infectious Death in Pediatric Fever in El Salvador
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0043639
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald Gavidia, Soad L. Fuentes, Roberto Vasquez, Miguel Bonilla, Marie-Chantal Ethier, Caroline Diorio, Miguela Caniza, Scott C. Howard, Lillian Sung

Abstract

Infection remains the most common cause of death from toxicity in children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries. Rapid administration of antibiotics when fever develops can prevent progression to sepsis and shock, and serves as an important indicator of the quality of care in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia. We analyzed factors associated with (1) Longer times from fever onset to hospital presentation/antibiotic treatment and (2) Sepsis and infection-related mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 134 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 35 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 39%
Psychology 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 40 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,914,371
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,395
of 193,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,342
of 169,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,563
of 4,305 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,305 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.