You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hypothalamic 2-Arachidonoylglycerol Regulates Multistage Process of High-Fat Diet Preferences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0038609 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sei Higuchi, Keiichi Irie, Ryuji Yamaguchi, Mai Katsuki, Maiko Araki, Makiko Ohji, Kazuhide Hayakawa, Shohei Mishima, Yoshiharu Akitake, Kiyoshi Matsuyama, Kenji Mishima, Kenichi Mishima, Katsunori Iwasaki, Michihiro Fujiwara |
| Abstract |
In this study, we examined alterations in the hypothalamic reward system related to high-fat diet (HFD) preferences. We previously reported that hypothalamic 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) and glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) were increased after conditioning to the rewarding properties of a HFD. Here, we hypothesized that increased 2-AG influences the hypothalamic reward system. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,664,478
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,232
of 193,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,596
of 164,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,923
of 3,923 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,923 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.