↓ Skip to main content

Resting-state connectivity of the amygdala is altered following Pavlovian fear conditioning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resting-state connectivity of the amygdala is altered following Pavlovian fear conditioning
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas H. Schultz, Nicholas L. Balderston, Fred J. Helmstetter

Abstract

Neural plasticity in the amygdala is necessary for the acquisition and storage of memory in Pavlovian fear conditioning, but most neuroimaging studies have focused only on stimulus-evoked responses during the conditioning session. This study examined changes in the resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) of the amygdala before and after Pavlovian fear conditioning, an emotional learning task. Behavioral results from the conditioning session revealed that participants learned normally and fMRI data recorded during learning identified a number of stimulus-evoked changes that were consistent with previous work. A direct comparison between the pre- and post-conditioning amygdala connectivity revealed a region of dorsal prefrontal cortex (PFC) in the superior frontal gyrus that showed a significant increase in connectivity following the conditioning session. A behavioral measure of explicit memory performance was positively correlated with the change in amygdala connectivity within a neighboring region in the superior frontal gyrus. Additionally, an implicit autonomic measure of conditioning was positively correlated with the change in connectivity between the amygdala and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). The resting-state data show that amygdala connectivity is altered following Pavlovian fear conditioning and that these changes are also related to behavioral outcomes. These alterations may reflect the operation of a consolidation process that strengthens neural connections to support memory after the learning event.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Germany 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 135 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 28%
Researcher 33 23%
Student > Master 19 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 9 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 28%
Neuroscience 34 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 11%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 22 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,257,104
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,100
of 7,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,308
of 251,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#241
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.