↓ Skip to main content

Protein Dynamics in Individual Human Cells: Experiment and Theory

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein Dynamics in Individual Human Cells: Experiment and Theory
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004901
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariel Aharon Cohen, Tomer Kalisky, Avi Mayo, Naama Geva-Zatorsky, Tamar Danon, Irina Issaeva, Ronen Benjamine Kopito, Natalie Perzov, Ron Milo, Alex Sigal, Uri Alon

Abstract

A current challenge in biology is to understand the dynamics of protein circuits in living human cells. Can one define and test equations for the dynamics and variability of a protein over time? Here, we address this experimentally and theoretically, by means of accurate time-resolved measurements of endogenously tagged proteins in individual human cells. As a model system, we choose three stable proteins displaying cell-cycle-dependant dynamics. We find that protein accumulation with time per cell is quadratic for proteins with long mRNA life times and approximately linear for a protein with short mRNA lifetime. Both behaviors correspond to a classical model of transcription and translation. A stochastic model, in which genes slowly switch between ON and OFF states, captures measured cell-cell variability. The data suggests, in accordance with the model, that switching to the gene ON state is exponentially distributed and that the cell-cell distribution of protein levels can be approximated by a Gamma distribution throughout the cell cycle. These results suggest that relatively simple models may describe protein dynamics in individual human cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Portugal 2 1%
Israel 2 1%
Estonia 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 141 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 25%
Researcher 35 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 9%
Student > Master 15 9%
Professor 14 9%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 12%
Physics and Astronomy 14 9%
Engineering 9 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 16 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2012.
All research outputs
#6,914,371
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,395
of 193,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,864
of 93,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#264
of 514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.