↓ Skip to main content

Novel microduplication of CHL1 gene in a patient with autism spectrum disorder: a case report and a brief literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cytogenetics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel microduplication of CHL1 gene in a patient with autism spectrum disorder: a case report and a brief literature review
Published in
Molecular Cytogenetics, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13039-016-0261-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunyang Li, Chunxue Liu, Bingrui Zhou, Chunchun Hu, Xiu Xu

Abstract

The cell adhesion molecule L1-like (CHL1 or CALL) gene is located on chromosome 3p26.3, and it is highly expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems. The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the L1 family of neural cell adhesion molecules, and it plays a role in nervous system development and synaptic plasticity. Moreover, studies of mice have revealed that CHL1 is a prime candidate gene for a dosage-sensitive autosomal form of mental retardation. To date, four patients with a microdeletion and two with a microduplication of 3p26.3 encompassing only the CHL1 gene have been reported in literature. In the present study, we have described a 16-month-old boy with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), developmental delay and minor dysmorphic facial features. This is the first report of a duplication of 3p26.3 including only the CHL1 gene in an ASD patient, and this duplication is the smallest reported to date in this gene. We also reviewed CHL1 gene mutation cases and examined whether this gene has an important role in cognitive function. We conclude that both CHL1 deletions and duplications are likely responsible for the patient's impaired cognitive function, and CHL1 may be an intriguing ASD candidate gene.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 20%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Unspecified 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Neuroscience 7 15%
Unspecified 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,856,117
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cytogenetics
#129
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,792
of 352,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cytogenetics
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.