↓ Skip to main content

Specialised antenatal clinics for women with a multiple pregnancy for improving maternal and infant outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Specialised antenatal clinics for women with a multiple pregnancy for improving maternal and infant outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005300.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Dodd, Jodie M, Crowther, Caroline A

Abstract

Regular antenatal care for women with a multiple pregnancy is accepted practice, and while most women have an increase in the number of antenatal visits, there is no consensus as to what constitutes optimal care. 'Specialised' antenatal clinics have been advocated as a way of improving outcomes for women and their infants.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 11%
Ethiopia 1 5%
India 1 5%
Ireland 1 5%
Netherlands 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 12 63%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 147%
Researcher 25 132%
Student > Bachelor 20 105%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 68%
Unspecified 12 63%
Other 19 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 326%
Unspecified 14 74%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 68%
Social Sciences 9 47%
Psychology 8 42%
Other 11 58%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2012.
All research outputs
#10,730,443
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,699
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,077
of 117,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.