↓ Skip to main content

Assessing outcomes of health and medical research: do we measure what counts or count what we can measure?

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Health Review, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing outcomes of health and medical research: do we measure what counts or count what we can measure?
Published in
Australian Health Review, June 2007
DOI 10.1186/1743-8462-4-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Wells, Judith A Whitworth

Abstract

Governments world wide are increasingly demanding outcome measures to evaluate research investment. Health and medical research outputs can be considered as gains in knowledge, wealth and health. Measurement of the impacts of research on health are difficult, particularly within the time frames of granting bodies. Thus evaluations often measure what can be measured, rather than what should be measured. Traditional academic metrics are insufficient to demonstrate societal benefit from public investment in health research. New approaches that consider all the benefits of research are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 27%
Researcher 8 18%
Other 6 13%
Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Social Sciences 11 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Computer Science 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 7 16%