You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Osteochondroplasty and Labral Repair for the Treatment of Young Adults With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The American Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0363546520952804 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Femoroacetabular Impingement Randomized Controlled Trial Investigators, Olufemi R. Ayeni, Jon Karlsson, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Lehana Thabane, Volker Musahl, Nicole Simunovic, Andrew Duong, Mohit Bhandari, Asheesh Bedi, Teppo Järvinen, Douglas Naudie, Matti Seppänen, Gerard Slobogean, Matthew Skelly, Ajay Shanmugaraj, Sarah Crouch, Sheila Sprague, Lisa Buckingham, Tim Ramsay, John Lee, Petteri Kousa, Sasha Carsen, Hema Choudur, Yan Sim, Kelly Johnston, Sheila Sprague, Ivan Wong, Ryland Murphy, Sara Sparavalo, Daniel Whelan, Ryan Khan, Gavin C.A. Wood, Fiona Howells, Heather Grant, Douglas Naudie, Bryn Zomar, Michael Pollock, Kevin Willits, Andrew Firth, Stacey Wanlin, Alliya Remtulla, Nicole Kaniki, Etienne L. Belzile, Sylvie Turmel, Uffe Jørgensen, Annie Gam-Pedersen, Tays Hatanpää, Raine Sihvonen, Marko Raivio, Pirjo Toivonen, Mari Pirjetta Routapohja |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Sweden | 4 | 5% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Finland | 3 | 4% |
| Denmark | 3 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 57% |
| Scientists | 18 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2021.
All research outputs
#946,966
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Sports Medicine
#423
of 5,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,770
of 429,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Sports Medicine
#3
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.