↓ Skip to main content

Pocket pain, does location matter: a single-centre retrospective study of patients implanted with a spinal cord stimulator

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 2,338)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pocket pain, does location matter: a single-centre retrospective study of patients implanted with a spinal cord stimulator
Published in
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, September 2020
DOI 10.1136/rapm-2020-101752
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ganesan Baranidharan, Beatrice Bretherton, Gemma Richert, Thomas Kay, Nathan Marsh, Bethan Roberts, Charlotte Romanis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Other 2 17%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 274. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#109,586
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#11
of 2,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,466
of 375,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#1
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.