↓ Skip to main content

Integrating physical and economic data into experimental water accounts for the United States: Lessons and opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystem Services, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrating physical and economic data into experimental water accounts for the United States: Lessons and opportunities
Published in
Ecosystem Services, October 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101182
Authors

Kenneth J. Bagstad, Zachary H. Ancona, Julie Hass, Pierre D. Glynn, Scott Wentland, Michael Vardon, John Fay

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 14%
Environmental Science 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 14%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,412,255
of 17,635,820 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystem Services
#118
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,965
of 317,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystem Services
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,635,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.