↓ Skip to main content

Data Integration Workflow for Search of Disease Driving Genes and Genetic Variants

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Data Integration Workflow for Search of Disease Driving Genes and Genetic Variants
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018636
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sirkku Karinen, Tuomas Heikkinen, Heli Nevanlinna, Sampsa Hautaniemi

Abstract

Comprehensive characterization of a gene's impact on phenotypes requires knowledge of the context of the gene. To address this issue we introduce a systematic data integration method Candidate Genes and SNPs (CANGES) that links SNP and linkage disequilibrium data to pathway- and protein-protein interaction information. It can be used as a knowledge discovery tool for the search of disease associated causative variants from genome-wide studies as well as to generate new hypotheses on synergistically functioning genes. We demonstrate the utility of CANGES by integrating pathway and protein-protein interaction data to identify putative functional variants for (i) the p53 gene and (ii) three glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) associated risk genes. For the GBM case, we further integrate the CANGES results with clinical and genome-wide data for 209 GBM patients and identify genes having effects on GBM patient survival. Our results show that selecting a focused set of genes can result in information beyond the traditional genome-wide association approaches. Taken together, holistic approach to identify possible interacting genes and SNPs with CANGES provides a means to rapidly identify networks for any set of genes and generate novel hypotheses. CANGES is available in http://csbi.ltdk.helsinki.fi/CANGES/

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 10%
Germany 2 4%
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 36 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 27%
Other 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 54%
Computer Science 6 13%
Engineering 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 1 2%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,752,694
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#79,397
of 193,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,856
of 108,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#650
of 1,481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.