RT @ChanceGardiner: Il 97% dei test PCR con 35 cicli di amplificazione erano falsi. Fino a 25 cicli c'è un’affidabilità del 70%, che scende…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Il 97% dei test PCR con 35 cicli di amplificazione erano falsi. Fino a 25 cicli c'è un’affidabilità del 70%, che scende…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Il 97% dei test PCR con 35 cicli di amplificazione erano falsi. Fino a 25 cicli c'è un’affidabilità del 70%, che scende…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Il 97% dei test PCR con 35 cicli di amplificazione erano falsi. Fino a 25 cicli c'è un’affidabilità del 70%, che scende…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Il 97% dei test PCR con 35 cicli di amplificazione erano falsi. Fino a 25 cicli c'è un’affidabilità del 70%, che scende…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Il 97% dei test PCR con 35 cicli di amplificazione erano falsi. Fino a 25 cicli c'è un’affidabilità del 70%, che scende…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Il 97% dei test PCR con 35 cicli di amplificazione erano falsi. Fino a 25 cicli c'è un’affidabilità del 70%, che scende…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Il 97% dei test PCR con 35 cicli di amplificazione erano falsi. Fino a 25 cicli c'è un’affidabilità del 70%, che scende…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Il 97% dei test PCR con 35 cicli di amplificazione erano falsi. Fino a 25 cicli c'è un’affidabilità del 70%, che scende…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Il 97% dei test PCR con 35 cicli di amplificazione erano falsi. Fino a 25 cicli c'è un’affidabilità del 70%, che scende…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Il 97% dei test PCR con 35 cicli di amplificazione erano falsi. Fino a 25 cicli c'è un’affidabilità del 70%, che scende…
Il 97% dei test PCR con 35 cicli di amplificazione erano falsi. Fino a 25 cicli c'è un’affidabilità del 70%, che scende a 20% con 30 cicli. Il Premio Nobel Kary Mullis inventore del PCR ce l'ha detto anche da morto, ma non l'hanno ascoltato. https://t.c
@marcelosvg @caro_oky It’s the same study. Jaafar and La Scola are both authors on it. https://t.co/WDZ17ug89c You are misunderstanding the study completely. Why? Because you do not realize that “Ct” is a RESULT of the test, not the number of cycles you r
@JDCBurnhil @LaurenWisk @JAMANetworkOpen @JAMANetwork @covidINSPIRE You believe in fairy tales darling. But yes, the world is Grimm! I know you need tabloids but here are hard facts. 97% false positive. https://t.co/mKv381rceO
@JaneHogarth84 @Sam_Saraguy @DrEliDavid “At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive.” https://t.co/qyf0TjPMSo
@LongCovidNews @maryhalton @WHO The PCR test used to diagnose an infection with SARS-CoV-2, was found to have as high as 97 percent of false positives for infectiousness because the test was so sensitive that it measured dead viruses that could not cause d
@TakethatCt @BrunoTheGreat32 @TomiLahren https://t.co/Oh0lwDqEfx at what cycle thresholds were most us labs running their tests at? 35 and even some as high as 40 ct's. that is called being scientifically dishonest
@wolsned 👇👇👇 at a cycle threshold of 35 https://t.co/eUsB8NItHn https://t.co/CExNnXTnEU
@mcfunny @IamBrookJackson @FDAfood @US_FDA "It can be observed that at Ct = 25, up to 70% of patients remain positive in culture and that at Ct = 30 this value drops to 20%. At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultu
@Canadam86133441 https://t.co/WDZ17ufAjE <= this is the study. 3,790 samples; NOT A SINGLE FALSE POSITIVE. The paper doesn’t even MENTION false positives. The question is “when can we be confident someone we KNOW is infected is no longer infectious?”
@Daniel_HVA @enquete2sens @DidierMaisto @CarolineFiat54 Non, ZERO tests ! Ils sont faux jusqu'à 97% (ex: les PCR passés 35 cycles), ils ne servent qu'a gonfler la baudruche du groVid et enrichir les proprios des brevets, comme celui pour détecter le c19 ..
@ShuGyo_A But you can’t assume that the Ct will be 40. Look at Jaafar et al - out of 3,790 samples they collected, NOT ONE had a Ct as high as 40 - and fewer than 3% had Ct results of 35 or more. You DO understand that Ct is not a SETTING, but a RESULT, r
RT @osamu_iga: 「Ct35以上で偽陽性97%」は誤魔化し。根拠とする論文の元データではCt35以上は全体の2.7%、その97%だから実際は2.6%となる。故に「Ct35以上で増殖不可の陽性は2.6%しかない」が正しい。高いCt値では発症前の無症状感染者の検査が重要…
RT @osamu_iga: 「Ct35以上で偽陽性97%」は誤魔化し。根拠とする論文の元データではCt35以上は全体の2.7%、その97%だから実際は2.6%となる。故に「Ct35以上で増殖不可の陽性は2.6%しかない」が正しい。高いCt値では発症前の無症状感染者の検査が重要…
@MichaeljSpence8 @JeromeAdamsMD FYI PCR is a Complete joke of a test https://t.co/eUsB8NItHn https://t.co/whQqCtPH94
RT @Kevin_McKernan: @StevenSalzberg1 @MicrobiomDigest That article didn’t age well. HCQ creates heart attacks:) Now do the vaccine. At leas…
RT @Kevin_McKernan: @StevenSalzberg1 @MicrobiomDigest That article didn’t age well. HCQ creates heart attacks:) Now do the vaccine. At leas…
RT @Kevin_McKernan: @StevenSalzberg1 @MicrobiomDigest That article didn’t age well. HCQ creates heart attacks:) Now do the vaccine. At leas…
@StevenSalzberg1 @MicrobiomDigest That article didn’t age well. HCQ creates heart attacks:) Now do the vaccine. At least his qPCR was calibrated against PFUs. I don’t see the same critiques from you on the 1day peer review of the Drosten PCR protocol. Sele
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
@Cyclowarrior @alexmeshkin The PCR test used to diagnose an infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was found to have as high as 97 percent of false positives because the test was so sensitive that it measured dead viruses that could not
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
RT @SpunkyStrings: @HoeyberghsJeff (4/4) De studie die gebruikt werd tijdens de Portugese rechtszaak, dd 28/09/2020👇 https://t.co/I4HykGoQD…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
@HoeyberghsJeff (4/4) De studie die gebruikt werd tijdens de Portugese rechtszaak, dd 28/09/2020👇 https://t.co/I4HykGoQDw (artikel mbt de rechtszaak: https://t.co/RZuJsO7n4w)
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
当初から偽陽性問題https://t.co/Sav1BoMuEc 未接種:CT40 97%偽陽性 接種:2021/5~偽陽性を最小限に抑えるCT28以下推奨 https://t.co/PywdWaJPYA *病院来ると、 内視鏡検査や入院時にPCRや抗原検査をするけど、 半か丁の博打の世界😮💨 https://t.co/24etekjkMc
RT @WilliamMarsWard: This paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT Infections. https://t.co/Viyke…
@TeemuX8 @baniarla @cia_kirsikka Kuka on väittänyt että nämä ovat pcr-testejä? Aloimme vain aiheeseen liittyen keskustelemaan pcr-testeistä. Juurihan minä edellisessä twiitissä kerroin että minä itse en näitä kotitestejä tehnyt. Ei sun tartte alkaa viisa
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: This paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT Infections. https://t.co/Viyke…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
@alexanderdecroo @openvld @vooruit @groen @de_NVA @JanJambon @pvdabelgie @vlaamseoverheid @vlaparl @Vlaamsbelang1 Waar blijft het verbod op de pcr-gate testen ? Gezien de hoeveelheid vals positieven had men zelfs nooit een pcr test dmv een kankerstokje in
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID IN…
@drsimonegold Nice. This PR paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT COVID INFECTIONS (Samples would not replicate in culture.) Case and death counts are fraudulent. The pandemic was a scam & govt response to
This paper from over 2 years ago showed over 49% of PCR Test Positive results were NOT Infections. https://t.co/ViykeOcNWf
I’d say that study was extremely generous. “At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive.” https://t.co/qyf0TjPf2Q
@felivald @natho47 @CCuadradoN @ChrisGarciaCL https://t.co/rxXqwe1gg9 https://t.co/5izAlnxGzC https://t.co/0vBxcRF0CY Prueba oficial que la OMS aprobó (40-45 ciclos) https://t.co/DhNTo40a0V Te sugiero veas este video a partir del minuto 12, lo entenderás
@realscottchegg @DrEliDavid Correlation Between 3790 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction–Positives Samples and Positive Cell Cultures, Including 1941 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Isolates https://t.co/vpYbPa4Cru
@mbk28 J'en suis CERTAIN à 200% Regardez cette publication avec 13 161 PCR positifs avec CT jusqu'à 37 Regardez ceux qui ont signé : D Raoult A l'IHU tous les PCR positifs jusqu'au CT de 35 étaient considérés comme valables Ecrit dans les protocoles IHU se
RT @SimonElmer2022: And on 28 September 2020, the IDSA, reporting on the results of 250,566 RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 on 179,151 individu…
RT @SimonElmer2022: And on 28 September 2020, the IDSA, reporting on the results of 250,566 RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 on 179,151 individu…
And on 28 September 2020, the IDSA, reporting on the results of 250,566 RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 on 179,151 individuals, concluded that at a Ct of 25 up to 70% of positive results are real positives (i.e. samples from which they can cultivate a virus).
@SisterSaraJean @conn48h @bookwych @TheoFleury14 Bless your heart. I got it by going back to the paper that all the dolts saying “97% false positives!!” were claiming as their source. And I read what the paper ACTUALLY SAID, instead of believing their lies
@EricTopol PCR “test” provides false positives at a rate exceeding 97%. “At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive.” https://t.co/qyf0TjPMSo
@gordoncraig11 @CatsCanines @david_r_morgan @DessyDimanova Wrong. “At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive.” https://t.co/qyf0TjxDEg
@user3184 @Hope_4youandme @Brandon_BigRed5 @JamesLWaldron2 @hodgetwins https://t.co/WDZ17tXYV4 <= THIS is the original article. It examined 3,790 samples. NOT ONE OF THEM WAS A FALSE POSITIVE. All 3,790 were confirmed cases of COVID-19. /
@mike_kelner @msvetov Грубо говоря, заболевшие участники кашляют в чашку Петри с клеточным материалом, аналогичным слизистой. Если там начинает развиваться вирус - кашлявший был заразен. В итоге сравнивается "заразность" целевой и контрольной группы. https
@janmariatalar @Brygada_Vrihedd @StanBorowa @ChceZrozumiec „Można zaobserwować, że przy Ct = 25, do 70% pacjentów pozostaje dodatnich w hodowli, a przy Ct = 30 wartość ta spada do 20%. Przy Ct = 35, wartości, której używamy do raportowania pozytywnych wyni
#PCR yzmy, idiotyzmy, covidianizmy i covidiotyzmy.
@janmariatalar @Brygada_Vrihedd @StanBorowa @ChceZrozumiec Nie jest bo nawet połowa pozytywów PCR może oznaczać, że materiał genetyczny zamplifikowany nie ma nic wspólnego z infekcją, nie jest to materiał zakaźny: https://t.co/24svuOCCuE
@TakethatCt @tsart4u1 @carmelon @jvipondmd At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive. https://t.co/qyf0TjxDEg
@KHugs88 @tsart4u1 @carmelon @jvipondmd Is that all you have to offer? Really? “At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive.” Here’s some real science and a court decision: https://t.co/Yg7Eg3JTYX h
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @Kevin_McKernan This paper supports the importance of culturing samples. 49% of the PCR-positive samples were not repl…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @Kevin_McKernan This paper supports the importance of culturing samples. 49% of the PCR-positive samples were not repl…
@Kevin_McKernan This paper supports the importance of culturing samples. 49% of the PCR-positive samples were not replicated in culture & ∴ NOT INFECTIONS! Treating all PCR+ results as infections falsely amplified the perception of the pandemic's size
RT @Kevin_McKernan: @db19794 @EduEngineer @Debunk_the_Funk The responsible players calibrate their qPCR tests to PFU/ml. https://t.co/eQ0n…
RT @Kevin_McKernan: @db19794 @EduEngineer @Debunk_the_Funk I’ll keep posting this until you read it. https://t.co/LDRwFxKfSD
RT @Kevin_McKernan: @db19794 @EduEngineer @Debunk_the_Funk I’ll keep posting this until you read it. https://t.co/LDRwFxKfSD
RT @Kevin_McKernan: @db19794 @EduEngineer @Debunk_the_Funk I’ll keep posting this until you read it. https://t.co/LDRwFxKfSD
RT @Kevin_McKernan: @db19794 @EduEngineer @Debunk_the_Funk I’ll keep posting this until you read it. https://t.co/LDRwFxKfSD
@db19794 @EduEngineer @Debunk_the_Funk I’ll keep posting this until you read it. https://t.co/LDRwFxKfSD
@db19794 @EduEngineer @Debunk_the_Funk The responsible players calibrate their qPCR tests to PFU/ml. https://t.co/eQ0nNVzwuF
@MeaghanBm @Roman_Baber You asked for the court case and I provided it. “At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive.” https://t.co/qyf0TjPMSo
After labs regularly conducted 37 to 40 PCR cycles to test for COVID-19, the CDC gave guidance to use only 27 cycles on vaccinated individuals. An Oxford publication concluded that 35 amplifications lead to a 97% chance of a false positive. https://t.co/4
@Tomaz79 @pkese @Julija9j @NIJZ_pr @MinZdravje At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive. https://t.co/aqY91lSIEp https://t.co/lM358TcLBs
@TilterWindmill @rjjmize @TheRealKeean Yet, I haven’t seen the court overturned yet. I’m waiting for it to happen. “At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive.” https://t.co/qyf0TjPf2Q
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @USMortality @MLevitt_NP2013 Testing is what brought us the appearance of a pandemic. The PCR test CANNOT detect a vir…
RT @WilliamMarsWard: @USMortality @MLevitt_NP2013 Testing is what brought us the appearance of a pandemic. The PCR test CANNOT detect a vir…
@USMortality @MLevitt_NP2013 Testing is what brought us the appearance of a pandemic. The PCR test CANNOT detect a viral infection - only the presence of a particle. This study shows only 50% of PCR Test positives were actual infections. W/ Cmax=45 only a
@mrscorer @IainMulady @TakethatCt "if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most labs in the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, & the probability that sai
@JohnnyBrist @real_seeking @PhillyPharmaBoy @Dozzle101 @elvisthecatlady @WADeptHealth No, of course you don’t know where that graph came from. Why? Because you didn’t DO THE RESEARCH like I did! The graph comes from Jaafar et al - the study that the Lisbon
@TakethatCt @wendy_Lynnette https://t.co/pStyP7urp2 what is right CT?
RT @jmcrookston: Ct cycle and positive cultures. From Sept 2020. Just bumped into it. https://t.co/yRku2Wn8AV https://t.co/YkUgJe61GQ
Ct cycle and positive cultures. From Sept 2020. Just bumped into it. https://t.co/yRku2Wn8AV https://t.co/YkUgJe61GQ
@KelleyKga Old but good https://t.co/pStyP7tTzu
RT @OssiTiihonen: @paavola_lauri Olisi voinut sanoa jotain vaikka sellaista, että yli 24 kierroksen monistuksia ei saa käyttää... https://t…