Title |
Comparative study of four SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) platforms demonstrates that ID NOW performance is impaired substantially by patient and specimen type
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115200 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul R Lephart, Michael A Bachman, William LeBar, Scott McClellan, Karen Barron, Lee Schroeder, Duane W Newton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 59 | 52% |
Canada | 7 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 39 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 87 | 77% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 13% |
Scientists | 10 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 14% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 26 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 27 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2020.
All research outputs
#567,881
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease
#5
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,682
of 426,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.