You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Developmental Perspective of Global and Local Visual Perception in Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-016-2834-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacalyn Guy, Laurent Mottron, Claude Berthiaume, Armando Bertone |
| Abstract |
Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate superior performances on visuo-spatial tasks emphasizing local information processing; however, findings from studies involving hierarchical stimuli are inconsistent. Wide age ranges and group means complicate their interpretability. Children and adolescents with and without ASD completed a Navon task wherein they identified global and local stimuli composed of either consistent or inconsistent letters. Trajectories of reaction time in global and local conditions were similar within and between groups when consistent and inconsistent stimuli were considered together, but the effect of local-to-global interference was significantly higher in participants with than without ASD. Age was not a significant predictor of local-to-global interference, suggesting that this effect emerges in childhood and persists throughout adolescence in ASD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 41 | 34% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2016.
All research outputs
#13,523,589
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,280
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,167
of 356,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#34
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.