↓ Skip to main content

The First Record of a Trans-Oceanic Sister-Group Relationship between Obligate Vertebrate Troglobites

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
29 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The First Record of a Trans-Oceanic Sister-Group Relationship between Obligate Vertebrate Troglobites
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0044083
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prosanta Chakrabarty, Matthew P. Davis, John S. Sparks

Abstract

We show using the most complete phylogeny of one of the most species-rich orders of vertebrates (Gobiiformes), and calibrations from the rich fossil record of teleost fishes, that the genus Typhleotris, endemic to subterranean karst habitats in southwestern Madagascar, is the sister group to Milyeringa, endemic to similar subterranean systems in northwestern Australia. Both groups are eyeless, and our phylogenetic and biogeographic results show that these obligate cave fishes now found on opposite ends of the Indian Ocean (separated by nearly 7,000 km) are each others closest relatives and owe their origins to the break up of the southern supercontinent, Gondwana, at the end of the Cretaceous period. Trans-oceanic sister-group relationships are otherwise unknown between blind, cave-adapted vertebrates and our results provide an extraordinary case of Gondwanan vicariance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 97 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Professor 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 76%
Environmental Science 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 6 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2021.
All research outputs
#696,750
of 25,517,918 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,298
of 222,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,616
of 188,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#135
of 4,373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,517,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.