↓ Skip to main content

The Classical r-Matrix of AdS/CFT and its Lie Bialgebra Structure

Overview of attention for article published in Communications in Mathematical Physics, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Classical r-Matrix of AdS/CFT and its Lie Bialgebra Structure
Published in
Communications in Mathematical Physics, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00220-008-0578-2
Authors

Niklas Beisert, Fabian Spill

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Professor 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 60%
Mathematics 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,485,894
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#368
of 2,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,870
of 82,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.