↓ Skip to main content

Functional Roles for Synaptic-Depression within a Model of the Fly Antennal Lobe

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional Roles for Synaptic-Depression within a Model of the Fly Antennal Lobe
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002622
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaditya V. Rangan

Abstract

Several experiments indicate that there exists substantial synaptic-depression at the synapses between olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) and neurons within the drosophila antenna lobe (AL). This synaptic-depression may be partly caused by vesicle-depletion, and partly caused by presynaptic-inhibition due to the activity of inhibitory local neurons within the AL. While it has been proposed that this synaptic-depression contributes to the nonlinear relationship between ORN and projection neuron (PN) firing-rates, the precise functional role of synaptic-depression at the ORN synapses is not yet fully understood. In this paper we propose two hypotheses linking the information-coding properties of the fly AL with the network mechanisms responsible for ORN-->AL synaptic-depression. Our first hypothesis is related to variance coding of ORN firing-rate information--once stimulation to the ORNs is sufficiently high to saturate glomerular responses, further stimulation of the ORNs increases the regularity of PN spiking activity while maintaining PN firing-rates. The second hypothesis proposes a tradeoff between spike-time reliability and coding-capacity governed by the relative contribution of vesicle-depletion and presynaptic-inhibition to ORN-->AL synaptic-depression. Synaptic-depression caused primarily by vesicle-depletion will give rise to a very reliable system, whereas an equivalent amount of synaptic-depression caused primarily by presynaptic-inhibition will give rise to a less reliable system that is more sensitive to small shifts in odor stimulation. These two hypotheses are substantiated by several small analyzable toy models of the fly AL, as well as a more physiologically realistic large-scale computational model of the fly AL involving 5 glomerular channels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 9%
United Kingdom 1 5%
Portugal 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 17 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 32%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 41%
Engineering 3 14%
Neuroscience 3 14%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,208
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,676
of 186,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#91
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.