You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Brain Tumor Discussions on Twitter (#BTSM): Social Network Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.2196/22005 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Josemari T Feliciano, Liz Salmi, Charlie Blotner, Adam Hayden, Edjah K Nduom, Bethany M Kwan, Matthew S Katz, Elizabeth B Claus |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 26 | 53% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 27 | 55% |
Scientists | 14 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Researcher | 4 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
Computer Science | 3 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,109,673
of 23,567,959 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#880
of 7,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,918
of 416,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#55
of 409 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 409 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.