@08MamaKitti08 @statsjamie Virus variants are normally less deadly than their parents. And 3-4 people died / 10,000 infected of those < 70 y.o. in this Oct. 2020 meta study (0.03-0.04%). And it's well established that cases and deaths have been conflate
Comment manipuler la conclusion d'une étude? 1. Ignorer les données qui nous contredisent (IFR jusqu'à 1.54%). 2. Prendre le plus petit chiffre du plus petit groupe (IFR le plus bas des <70 ans). 3. Prétendre que la fourchette entière se trouve dans
@LordComander762 @Eisvoge97966962 @Schwtzer2 @klarsichten @tagesschau Googeln kannst du nicht selbst? https://t.co/s3KghLmxsO
RT @ItSandorfi: @misterio553 @lord_juli @ccarballo50 @SextaNocheTV Es preferible tratar a ésta enfermedad como lo que es: un virus respirat…
RT @ItSandorfi: @misterio553 @lord_juli @ccarballo50 @SextaNocheTV Es preferible tratar a ésta enfermedad como lo que es: un virus respirat…
@MaximeRichard24 @jhamel Beau chiffre sorti de votre imagination. Avec un IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5% le SARS-COV2 se compare aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. https://t.co/xmYhO9PstE
RT @ivaningrad: IFR: 0.15-0.20% toda la población, como una gripe fuerte. 0.03-0.0.4% en <70 años, menos que la gripe. La última versión d…
@drpeterberg @Chris__Tus Gibt es Ärzte und Immunologen mit denen sie ein offenes Gespräch hatten, die das anders sehen? Was halten sie bspw. von dieser kleinen Studie hier, sie ist ihnen sicher bekannt: https://t.co/jvsijfLITX (John P. A. Ioannidis)
@IsaacGonT @pequena_roca @mjvicentemontes @Newtral Letalidad, IFR, entre el 0.15% y el 0.2% para toda la población, menos del 0.05% para menores de 70 años. https://t.co/6hrZUeuheK
@MichaelPSenger Agreed, @MichaelPSenger! Only 3-4 people die / 10,000 infected of those who are < 70 y.o. (0.03-0.04%; https://t.co/D9QsRrWS0x). San Francisco lost 49 / 100,000 people in the first year, infected or not (https://t.co/bLUmSLIoma). Variant
@SharmilaVelamur @markyeg @MichaelPSenger @themorg505 @SharmilaVelamur, see this -- incl. the links at the top. This is from CDC data, and studies show that incidents are over 10x what you see here (https://t.co/hDUEyVd8XR). In contrast, 3-4 people die / 1
@the_apex_dawn @JJuteux Faut essayer de suivre. Cela vous évitera de dire la même chose que moi. https://t.co/P2SToT7suJ
@the_apex_dawn @JJuteux Avec son IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5% le SARS-COV2 se compare aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. L'influenza saisonnier c'est entre 0.05% et 0.1%. https://t.co/xmYhO9PstE
@MarcusPun @doonstr @jaykass68k @KevinKileyCA The numbers are highly inflated because of CDC's loose criteria for deaths to be recorded as "likely" COVID, w/no positive PCR needed, no auditing afterward, and extra $ to hospitals to do so. For those < 70
@KarenKts11 @BorisJohnson The infection fatality rate (according WHO advisor Professor John Ioannidis) is 0.15-0.20% (0.03-0.04% in those <70 years). Fatality rate for flu is 0.1%, so higher than Covid for under 70 year olds - should we wear masks &
@ByrneLuc @Wolfnook @BBCPolitics 0.3% is probably high end, even before "vaccine" rollout. "Global infection fatality rate is 0.15-0.20%" https://t.co/VabCSpeLkB Did you really not know that? What did you think the death rate was? In same ballpark as pande
@SuperSpain67 @todoliderazgo La letalidad es diez veces menor que lo que señalais; en el orden de 0.15%, similar a la gripe estacional. https://t.co/XEKKU2efg3
RT @ComradeDoom1: John Ioannidis from a year ago https://t.co/eQoWDBUf9f https://t.co/xyaAHIFgk5
@denoncer @mauraislive Taux de mortalité de la rougeole: 2% à 15% Taux de mortalité de la COVID (moins de 70 ans) : 0.04% #Fact #Math #Data https://t.co/xmYhO9PstE
@LiPekka @freyhk @PauliRautiainen IFR alle 70-v. 0.05 eli verrattavissa influenssaan. https://t.co/eTPa2IJpcu
@OttoMeri Meillä ei ole pandemiaa, korona ei ole yleisvaarallinen tauti. Rokotukset eivät estä infektioita. Pakkorokotukset kv-sopimusten perusteella laittomia. Näistä premisseistä kun lähdetään keskustelemaan niin tulosta tulee. https://t.co/eTPa2IJpcu
Covid-19 Global infection fatality rate is 0.15-0.20% AND 0.03-0.04% in those less than 70 years old. Author: Ioannidis John https://t.co/eTPa2IJpcu
@Cadderito @ollysmithtravel Sure about that? https://t.co/ag6nt8hYYg https://t.co/OxcyoZHbx6
RT @MagChange_73: Avec un IFR entre 0.04% et 0.2% le SARS-COV2 se compare à l'influenza saisonnière ou, au pire, aux pandémies d'influenza…
Avec un IFR entre 0.04% et 0.2% le SARS-COV2 se compare à l'influenza saisonnière ou, au pire, aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. #Fact #Data #Math https://t.co/xmYhO9PstE
@2021Some1 @MurphyEmil @NewstalkZB Precisely I don't believe intelligence is confined to 1 person. But rather that we share our knowledge through experience, science, culture. IFR? https://t.co/PwuP8wdOD7
@AnnaDingens @LauraSchmidt80 @adelheidmal12ll @BurkhartLensing https://t.co/jvsijfLITX Ioannidis sagt etwas von 0.04% unter 70 Jahren und 0.2% darüber. Ab wann würden sie von gering sprechen?
@Tommes_cyo @KELLAN1v9 Der Link zu seinem Kommentar: https://t.co/ZdeFEhCbnJ Dieser kommentar hat keine eigene Forschung betrieben sondern zitiert auch hier nur ausgewiesene Primärquellen und gibt diese verfälscht wieder. Weil es ein Kommentar ist gibt es
RT @wesbury: Peer-reviewed paper on COVID that finds “Global infection fatality rate [IFR] is 0.15‐0.20% (0.03‐0.04% in those <70 years)”.…
@Janet805Sb I must confess I am bamboozled by any 'data' available for vax injuries, there doesn't seem to be a reliable source, and I just don't know what to believe. But this paper by Professor Ioannidis is useful for mortality: https://t.co/WmV8XLCtkq
@looking5452 So much could be said about testing. The way we ran tests didn't do anything except create false cases/deaths. But you have a point. The real issue is infections & we don't know that number. I like Ioannidis's analysis: C19 IFR ~ 50% of F
@joninaction @ParlayKingLG @pookie123321123 @PatriotChrisQ @etamb @kerpen Your second line seems to say that approx. 7K die / 100K unvac'd people over 50 y.o. Do you think that?That's 7 out of every 100 ppl. From Pubmed: 3-4 ppl die / 10,000 infected of th
@TKunysz @TimMillbrook @JackPosobiec 11x approx. 0 = approx. 0. Pubmed: 3-4 people die / 10,000 infected of those < 70 y.o. But VAERS is off the charts. And the Amish have ignored almost everything and are doing better than anyone else. https://t.co/D9Q
RT @FrankSch: Falls es jemand nicht mitbekommen haben sollte: Professor Ioannidis hat seine Zahlen aktualisiert. Die Sterblichkeitsrate, d…
RT @FrankSch: Falls es jemand nicht mitbekommen haben sollte: Professor Ioannidis hat seine Zahlen aktualisiert. Die Sterblichkeitsrate, d…
@ProgressiveTRUT @RWMaloneMD The CDC’s new IFR is still 5-10x high compared with Ioannidis/Stanford. The fake higher numbers are needed to pull off the plan.
@WahnSager @Vincent92695247 @StarDust240781 Korrigiere: der Infizierten. Studie zur infection fatality rate, John Ioannidis, Stanford University https://t.co/5El9QB3Rwa
@maheini @MartinScheininF Siitä numeroita jos ymmärrys sen sallii. Global infection fatality rate is 0.15-0.20% (0.03-0.04% in those <70 years). Mikä taudista tekee yleisvaarallisen jos kuoleman riski alle 70 on 0.03? Verrattuna normi-influenssaan. http
@MaKriKaLi @lapinpuolustaja @WoodyW00dlegger @pbyrokraatti Global infection fatality rate for COVID is 0.15-0.20% (0.03-0.04% in those <70 years). https://t.co/eTPa2IJpcu
RT @SabinaWalker18: 11.6/x WHY #lockdown? Survival % 99.96-99.97% for <70 9,996-9,997 of 10,000 ppl <70 SURVIVE “Global infection fatalit…
RT @ComradeDoom1: John Ioannidis from a year ago https://t.co/eQoWDBUf9f https://t.co/xyaAHIFgk5
John Ioannidis from a year ago https://t.co/eQoWDBUf9f https://t.co/xyaAHIFgk5
@JohnSmi33440597 @marcperreault18 @YvonMarquis @E_Duhaime @francoislegault @AssnatQc Avec un IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5%, le COVID-19 est comparable aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. #fact #data #maths https://t.co/xmYhO9PstE
@hugodejonge Blijf bij de feiten, de Jonge!! We horen en lezen ook het tegenovergestelde https://t.co/O7WVXT6x49
@Wal_Trudeau @RealAlexMatthew @Chauvesouris965 @Saoube9 @laurentcadotte Avec un IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5% le COVID-19 est comparable aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. https://t.co/xmYhO9PstE
@JfcroteauJF @KamradPout @JoeCorbet Avec un IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5% le SARS-COV2 se compare aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. #Fact #Maths #data https://t.co/xmYhO9PstE
@reinier_tromp @JSatyameva @MartinKulldorff @reinier_tromp, see these: https://t.co/D9QsRrWS0x (0.03-0.04% = 3-4 people / 10,000) .. https://t.co/V60JPWjhR4 (note the graph!) .. https://t.co/oLyCNdyw22. Please also see these examples of νас. injuries: http
@philovent @LobservateurLi1 @jhamel Avec un IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5% le COVID-19 est comparable aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. https://t.co/xmYhO9PstE
@gun_control_ca @Yukon_Strong Demonstrably false. With an infection fatality rate (IFR) of about 0.1% to 0.5% in most countries, COVID-19 is most closely comparable to the medium influenza pandemics of 1936, 1957 and 1968. https://t.co/xmYhO9PstE
@gun_control_ca @Yukon_Strong With an infection fatality rate (IFR) of about 0.1% to 0.5% in most countries, COVID-19 is most closely comparable to the medium influenza pandemics of 1936, 1957 and 1968. https://t.co/xmYhO9PstE
RT @MagChange_73: Avec un IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5%; le COVID-19 est comparable aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. https://t.co/xmYh…
@hoopaloupe @tommy20874071 @momsuperpower @RWMaloneMD Out by a factor of 5-7 according to the leading authority's peer reviewed estimation. https://t.co/Xn0BZWg4dI
Avec un IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5%; le COVID-19 est comparable aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. https://t.co/xmYhO9xR54 Et la plus récente du Pr. Ioannidis avec les IFR par tranche d'âge. https://t.co/pX0jn70hhh
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @BadCOVID19Takes: Context: This estimate for Covid IFR was never well-grounded, and was particularly indefensible by last October. https…
Context: This estimate for Covid IFR was never well-grounded, and was particularly indefensible by last October. https://t.co/SF2T1cClvs
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @MaxDelvallee: Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
Le papier de Ioannidis : https://t.co/Ewu4MBEKme
RT @infect_prevent: „Learning to live with COVID-19 and using effective, precise, least disruptive measures is essential to avoid such disa…
„Learning to live with COVID-19 and using effective, precise, least disruptive measures is essential to avoid such disasters and to help minimize the adverse impact of the pandemic.“
@MaximeRichard24 @E_Duhaime Avec un IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5%; le COVID-19 est comparable aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. https://t.co/xmYhO9xR54 Et la plus récente du Pr. Ioannidis avec les IFR par tranche d'âge. https://t.co/xdZ2dXOaf1
@NoRealClarkKent @Franz_Metzger1 @reitschuster Das trifft auf Ihren Tweet sicher zu. https://t.co/itImSr7dBO › bulletin › volumes › 99 › 1 › 20-265892.pdf https://t.co/urXFo7G3Rl https://t.co/PZxO1s9clC
@wendigocabreado @toniovaquerop @Nomaguanto @7nn_Tv @GarcinunoLopez La letalidad sobre contagiados, IFR, SÍ es del 0.2%: https://t.co/6hrZUeuheK
@jefbouch @Chat_Sidere @Stef_32 @jhamel Avec un IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5%; le COVID-19 est comparable aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. https://t.co/xmYhO9xR54 Et la plus récente du Pr. Ioannidis avec les IFR par tranche d'âge. https://t.co/pX0jn
@Skeptic_j @CarlosTabarnak @VezoVezir Avec un IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5%; le COVID-19 est comparable aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. https://t.co/xmYhO9xR54 Et la plus récente du Pr. Ioannidis avec les IFR par tranche d'âge. https://t.co/pX0jn70
@nicp794 @5Nanc5 @SebBovetSRC @francoislegault @PconservateurQc En fait, c'est plutôt un IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5%; le COVID-19 est comparable aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. https://t.co/xmYhO9xR54
@trotclo @K36820913 @AntoineBernier2 Avec un IFR entre 0.1% et 0.5%, le COVID-19 est comparable aux pandémies d'influenza de 1957 et 1968. https://t.co/xmYhO9PstE
RT @DrJBhattacharya: Ioannidis: Simulations show covid deaths minimized over long term if high risk groups can be preferentially protected…
@Smitty85331 @ChuziChips @Snowden Ah yes, totally fake. https://t.co/X79SEx8b6x fAkE
RT @DrJBhattacharya: Ioannidis: Simulations show covid deaths minimized over long term if high risk groups can be preferentially protected…
RT @DrJBhattacharya: Ioannidis: Simulations show covid deaths minimized over long term if high risk groups can be preferentially protected…
RT @fasalash: @AXELKAISER complemento: https://t.co/hzcjcq7w8G
@AXELKAISER complemento: https://t.co/hzcjcq7w8G