You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Abdominal Contents from Two Large Early Cretaceous Compsognathids (Dinosauria: Theropoda) Demonstrate Feeding on Confuciusornithids and Dromaeosaurids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0044012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lida Xing, Phil R. Bell, W. Scott Persons, Shuan Ji, Tetsuto Miyashita, Michael E. Burns, Qiang Ji, Philip J. Currie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 17% |
| Canada | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 76% |
| Scientists | 13 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 65 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 32 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#353,658
of 25,885,956 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,996
of 225,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,666
of 188,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#58
of 4,346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.