Title |
Classification of aerosol-generating procedures: a rapid systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Open Respiratory Research, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000730 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tanya Jackson, Danika Deibert, Graeme Wyatt, Quentin Durand-Moreau, Anil Adisesh, Kamlesh Khunti, Sachin Khunti, Simon Smith, Xin Hui S Chan, Lawrence Ross, Nia Roberts, Elaine Toomey, Trisha Greenhalgh, Isheeta Arora, Susannah M Black, Jonathan Drake, Nandana Syam, Robert Temple, Sebastian Straube |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 580 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 125 | 22% |
Australia | 36 | 6% |
United States | 32 | 6% |
Canada | 30 | 5% |
Ireland | 15 | 3% |
Spain | 8 | 1% |
Germany | 5 | <1% |
Curaçao | 5 | <1% |
South Africa | 4 | <1% |
Other | 43 | 7% |
Unknown | 277 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 443 | 76% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 70 | 12% |
Scientists | 50 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 269 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 31 | 12% |
Researcher | 29 | 11% |
Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
Other | 23 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
Other | 59 | 22% |
Unknown | 88 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
Engineering | 11 | 4% |
Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
Other | 33 | 12% |
Unknown | 98 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 460. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#55,871
of 24,522,750 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#3
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,917
of 421,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,522,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.