↓ Skip to main content

Classification of aerosol-generating procedures: a rapid systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Respiratory Research, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 644)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
580 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
Title
Classification of aerosol-generating procedures: a rapid systematic review
Published in
BMJ Open Respiratory Research, October 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000730
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanya Jackson, Danika Deibert, Graeme Wyatt, Quentin Durand-Moreau, Anil Adisesh, Kamlesh Khunti, Sachin Khunti, Simon Smith, Xin Hui S Chan, Lawrence Ross, Nia Roberts, Elaine Toomey, Trisha Greenhalgh, Isheeta Arora, Susannah M Black, Jonathan Drake, Nandana Syam, Robert Temple, Sebastian Straube

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 580 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 269 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Master 25 9%
Other 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 59 22%
Unknown 88 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Engineering 11 4%
Unspecified 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 98 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 460. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#55,871
of 24,522,750 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#3
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,917
of 421,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,522,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.