↓ Skip to main content

Investigating the Potential Use of Environmental DNA (eDNA) for Genetic Monitoring of Marine Mammals

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
297 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
925 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating the Potential Use of Environmental DNA (eDNA) for Genetic Monitoring of Marine Mammals
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041781
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D. Foote, Philip Francis Thomsen, Signe Sveegaard, Magnus Wahlberg, Jos Kielgast, Line A. Kyhn, Andreas B. Salling, Anders Galatius, Ludovic Orlando, M. Thomas P. Gilbert

Abstract

The exploitation of non-invasive samples has been widely used in genetic monitoring of terrestrial species. In aquatic ecosystems, non-invasive samples such as feces, shed hair or skin, are less accessible. However, the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) has recently been shown to be an effective tool for genetic monitoring of species presence in freshwater ecosystems. Detecting species in the marine environment using eDNA potentially offers a greater challenge due to the greater dilution, amount of mixing and salinity compared with most freshwater ecosystems. To determine the potential use of eDNA for genetic monitoring we used specific primers that amplify short mitochondrial DNA sequences to detect the presence of a marine mammal, the harbor porpoise, Phocoena phocoena, in a controlled environment and in natural marine locations. The reliability of the genetic detections was investigated by comparing with detections of harbor porpoise echolocation clicks by static acoustic monitoring devices. While we were able to consistently genetically detect the target species under controlled conditions, the results from natural locations were less consistent and detection by eDNA was less successful than acoustic detections. However, at one site we detected long-finned pilot whale, Globicephala melas, a species rarely sighted in the Baltic. Therefore, with optimization aimed towards processing larger volumes of seawater this method has the potential to compliment current visual and acoustic methods of species detection of marine mammals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 925 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 887 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 187 20%
Student > Master 151 16%
Student > Bachelor 147 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 138 15%
Other 48 5%
Other 101 11%
Unknown 153 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 426 46%
Environmental Science 160 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 106 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 2%
Engineering 7 <1%
Other 41 4%
Unknown 168 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 270. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#123,996
of 24,247,965 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,919
of 208,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#529
of 172,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#24
of 4,362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,247,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.