↓ Skip to main content

Negative visual representation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease occurs online

Overview of attention for article published in ERJ Open Research, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative visual representation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease occurs online
Published in
ERJ Open Research, October 2020
DOI 10.1183/23120541.00549-2020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Freya Berenyi, Sara Booth, Anna Spathis, Natasha Smallwood

Abstract

Internet images associated with breathlessness and COPD are mainly aimed at clinicians, more likely to be negative, and are gender and culturally exclusive compared with other cardiorespiratory conditions https://bit.ly/2DMfs0r.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,155,044
of 17,601,811 outputs
Outputs from ERJ Open Research
#122
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,283
of 321,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ERJ Open Research
#14
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,601,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.