| Title |
Is hypoxemia explained by intracardiac or intrapulmonary shunt in COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00726-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Masi, François Bagate, Thomas d’Humières, Lara Al-Assaad, Laure Abou Chakra, Genevieve Derumeaux, Armand Mekontso Dessap |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Librarian | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,019,797
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#554
of 1,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,128
of 399,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#21
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.