You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nanoscale imaging of RNA with expansion microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.3899 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fei Chen, Asmamaw T Wassie, Allison J Cote, Anubhav Sinha, Shahar Alon, Shoh Asano, Evan R Daugharthy, Jae-Byum Chang, Adam Marblestone, George M Church, Arjun Raj, Edward S Boyden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 32% |
| Germany | 5 | 6% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 58% |
| Scientists | 32 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 934 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 906 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 229 | 25% |
| Researcher | 183 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 93 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 87 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 5% |
| Other | 143 | 15% |
| Unknown | 155 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 238 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 190 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 96 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 70 | 7% |
| Engineering | 62 | 7% |
| Other | 100 | 11% |
| Unknown | 178 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 165. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#249,329
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#237
of 5,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,864
of 370,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#4
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.