↓ Skip to main content

Current real-life use of vasopressors and inotropes in cardiogenic shock - adrenaline use is associated with excess organ injury and mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
175 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current real-life use of vasopressors and inotropes in cardiogenic shock - adrenaline use is associated with excess organ injury and mortality
Published in
Critical Care, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1387-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tuukka Tarvasmäki, Johan Lassus, Marjut Varpula, Alessandro Sionis, Reijo Sund, Lars Køber, Jindrich Spinar, John Parissis, Marek Banaszewski, Jose Silva Cardoso, Valentina Carubelli, Salvatore Di Somma, Alexandre Mebazaa, Veli-Pekka Harjola, for the CardShock study investigators

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 241 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Other 27 11%
Student > Postgraduate 23 9%
Student > Master 21 9%
Other 55 23%
Unknown 61 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Neuroscience 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 72 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#360,470
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#191
of 6,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,078
of 371,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.