You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Magnetohydrodynamics modeling of coronal magnetic field and solar eruptions based on the photospheric magnetic field
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, July 2016
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||75%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||25%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||9||30%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||7%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||2||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Physics and Astronomy||21||70%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||1||3%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2016.
All research outputs
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 354,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.