You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An evaluation of two large scale demand side financing programs for maternal health in India: the MATIND study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-699 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristi Sidney, Ayesha de Costa, Vishal Diwan, Dileep V Mavalankar, Helen Smith, and the MATIND study team |
| Abstract |
High maternal mortality in India is a serious public health challenge. Demand side financing interventions have emerged as a strategy to promote access to emergency obstetric care. Two such state run programs, Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY)and Chiranjeevi Yojana (CY), were designed and implemented to reduce financial access barriers that preclude women from obtaining emergency obstetric care. JSY, a conditional cash transfer, awards money directly to a woman who delivers in a public health facility. This will be studied in Madhya Pradesh province. CY, a voucher based program, empanels private obstetricians in Gujarat province, who are reimbursed by the government to perform deliveries of socioeconomically disadvantaged women. The programs have been in operation for the last seven years. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 | 1% |
| Cambodia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,752,694
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,037
of 14,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,298
of 169,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#129
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.