Up to 50% of PCR testing are false positives. Please share this. @Philhay74471895 @TheAngryYorksh1 @sweetren215 @Milagrin9 https://t.co/2c0Agl4ZUB
@CassiusKlaei @poetryf Και για του λόγου το αληθές: Κλινική έρευνα = Στο 44% τα λεγόμενα ψευδή-θετικά αποτελέσματα του PCR Test . Όμως, ο κόσμος συνεχίζει να μπαίνει καραντίνα και να τον αποκλείουν από την δουλειά του αλλά και την ελεύθερη διακίνηση του
RT @hommel_b: Ik geef het eerder genoemde artikel over de 'vals-positieven' bij een lage prevalentie van besmettingen met het SARS-CoV-2 vi…
@GNev2 Some one should ask him about this https://t.co/VpP3e3fMFw Why is there no attention on this PCR study? Uk lab says 50% false
RT @AndrewM13604354: @ClareCraigPath Addenbrooke’s paper indicates half of positives were false in their excellent lab under less pressured…
@AndrewMorganRCT @VikkiHowells can you confirm if your aware of the false positive ration in RCT. I have linked a recent UK Lab study who are processing PCR tests. Is half of all tested in wales really false positives? https://t.co/VpP3e3fMFw
RT @woody_hXc: @EwaLTylkoPytam Dziennik "Mikrobiologii Klinicznej i Zakażeń" zamieścił wyniki badania, w którym po ponownym testowaniu prób…
@MartinWaltherDD @19Mookie76 @BierStefan Ja. "When SARS-CoV-2 prevalence is low, many positive test results are false positives. Confirmatory testing reduces overdiagnosis and nosocomial infection and enables real-world estimates of test specificity and po
RT @woody_hXc: @EwaLTylkoPytam Dziennik "Mikrobiologii Klinicznej i Zakażeń" zamieścił wyniki badania, w którym po ponownym testowaniu prób…
@MichaelThau @MichaelPSenger https://t.co/3yZrkdmAFz In the absence of a gold standard, it is impossible to assess the true performance of any test. That is fundamental. There appears to be a substantial false + rate when the test is compared with itself
RT @woody_hXc: @EwaLTylkoPytam Dziennik "Mikrobiologii Klinicznej i Zakażeń" zamieścił wyniki badania, w którym po ponownym testowaniu prób…
@melaniedesmith @socioEqualiser @Bessiered @carlheneghan @LozzaFox @trishgreenhalgh Very recent from Addenbrookes showing 50% of positives analyses were false: https://t.co/6o76BXODKT
RT @AthensGastro: Από το πανεπιστημιακό νοσοκομείο Addenbrooke's του Cambridge: Το 44% των PCR ήταν ψευδώς θετικά. https://t.co/Z2i1YlMlOk
@LaurieBriggs11 @Dane_hk @GovMikeDeWine @fox8news Here you go. 2 things. 1, + asymptomatic tests are certainly not cases.That's why we have both a CFR and an IFR. Its one of this constant lies.For some data on false positives this is a study from last week
RT @woody_hXc: @EwaLTylkoPytam Dziennik "Mikrobiologii Klinicznej i Zakażeń" zamieścił wyniki badania, w którym po ponownym testowaniu prób…
RT @woody_hXc: @EwaLTylkoPytam Dziennik "Mikrobiologii Klinicznej i Zakażeń" zamieścił wyniki badania, w którym po ponownym testowaniu prób…
RT @woody_hXc: @EwaLTylkoPytam Dziennik "Mikrobiologii Klinicznej i Zakażeń" zamieścił wyniki badania, w którym po ponownym testowaniu prób…
RT @woody_hXc: @EwaLTylkoPytam Dziennik "Mikrobiologii Klinicznej i Zakażeń" zamieścił wyniki badania, w którym po ponownym testowaniu prób…
RT @woody_hXc: @EwaLTylkoPytam Dziennik "Mikrobiologii Klinicznej i Zakażeń" zamieścił wyniki badania, w którym po ponownym testowaniu prób…
@EwaLTylkoPytam Dziennik "Mikrobiologii Klinicznej i Zakażeń" zamieścił wyniki badania, w którym po ponownym testowaniu próbek wyszło, że 44% z nich to wyniki fałszywie pozytywne https://t.co/oMQm5IRgy2
RT @ThinkingSlow1: This study established 44% tests were false positives - positive not repeated on follow up tests. That + fact current c…
@ordemespontanea Estás a dizer esse número com base neste paper? https://t.co/rXdgFWvFeD
@LarcombePeter @debnicktom @RhonddaBryant Here is a recent study, I look forward to your analysis of it lol https://t.co/VpP3e3fMFw
RT @ThinkingSlow1: @simondolan @AndyBurnhamGM This study established 44% tests were false positives - positive not repeated on follow up te…
RT @MelandBillinda: Wetenschap is waar. Maar sommige wetenschap is kennelijk meer waar dan andere. Volgens PCR-adepten en Epidemie-believer…
Wetenschap is waar. Maar sommige wetenschap is kennelijk meer waar dan andere. Volgens PCR-adepten en Epidemie-believers dan. De media doet vervolgens het vuile (filter)werk. Zodoende wordt er een ééndimensionale werkelijkheid doorheen gedramd. Dissidenten
Yes but with the important proviso that overall figures are low.
RT @ThinkingSlow1: @simondolan @AndyBurnhamGM This study established 44% tests were false positives - positive not repeated on follow up te…
@simondolan @AndyBurnhamGM This study established 44% tests were false positives - positive not repeated on follow up tests. That + fact current cases are mainly in 20-39 age group with low chance of hospitalisation means Gov effectively manufacturing a s
@BhChillin76 @Bildge3 @NeilDotObrien There is evidence from multiple countries: Read my thread and read this paper from Addenbrookes https://t.co/oijAOgCv3n https://t.co/DVGXUQzlxY
@MichaelYeadon3 @threadreaderapp Michael have you read this paper in relation to PCR tests?https://t.co/DVGXUQzlxY
RT @pdubdev: Hospital study shows 44% of tests were false positives when retested. #scamdemic https://t.co/zo1cxmiKep
This study established 44% tests were false positives - positive not repeated on follow up tests. That + fact current cases are mainly in 20-39 age group with low chance of hospitalisation means Gov effectively manufacturing a second wave. https://t.co/9
RT @pdubdev: Hospital study shows 44% of tests were false positives when retested. #scamdemic https://t.co/zo1cxmiKep
RT @LConraria: Artigo científico publicado na semana passada confirmando que há uma taxa elevada de falsos positivos e concluindo que depoi…
44% of "positive" tests are actually false positives in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence (which is most areas these days). Source: https://t.co/INYsBvB4m5 https://t.co/Sv0nayrPLI #themoreyouknow
RT @LConraria: Artigo científico publicado na semana passada confirmando que há uma taxa elevada de falsos positivos e concluindo que depoi…
@JohnHodgson1975 @NickTriggle @ProfKarolSikora Trouble is we don't know how many of the "covid" patients really have covid due to false positives. This lab proved half of their positives were false in quieter times. Under pressure could well be higher. htt
RT @LConraria: Artigo científico publicado na semana passada confirmando que há uma taxa elevada de falsos positivos e concluindo que depoi…
@firebrand73 @NeilDotObrien Have you read this paper? https://t.co/DVGXUQzlxY
Nunca se saberá a verdade desta psicose covid.. Nunca
RT @LConraria: Artigo científico publicado na semana passada confirmando que há uma taxa elevada de falsos positivos e concluindo que depoi…
Certo. Não li o artigo, mas parece lógico atendendo ao que se sabe. Contudo, havendo sintomas claros, apostaria que o segundo teste é dispensável.
Artigo científico publicado na semana passada confirmando que há uma taxa elevada de falsos positivos e concluindo que depois de um teste positivo se deve logo fazer outro. https://t.co/3RIMAuAMxX
RT @ClareCraigPath: Well done to the Addenbrokes lab for this. These false positives exclude those caused by cross contamination or RNA she…
RT @TheLongerGame: As I thought UK deaths could be under 5000 Big up Addenbrooke's Hope fully this is start of this Govts downfall Blood on…
RT @AndrewM13604354: @ClareCraigPath Addenbrooke’s paper indicates half of positives were false in their excellent lab under less pressured…
@DrDomPimenta 44% false positive, positives not confirmed on repeat test. That can happen with ludicrous cycle threshold. I guess like Nobel Laureate Levitt, Professor Gupta etc. - you are going to tell us Cambridge physics is mistaken? @JuliaHB1 http
@Ic4RuS_EU @hendrikstreeck @angelovalidiya Super, dann kann man endlich genauer Viren sequenzieren und so Falsch-Positive durch bessere Reagenzien minimieren... Also auch gezielter aktive Viren suchen (z.B. längere/mehr Zielsequenzen). Hoher ct-value evtl.
@mikolaj_kam A w tym badaniu, czy dobrze zrozumiałem, że po ponownych testach wstępnie pozytywnych rezultatów PCR wyszło, że 44% wyników było fałszywie pozytywnych ? https://t.co/oMQm5IRgy2
@orneryMD81 @GovLarryHogan We're creating a #Casedemic that we'll never be able to get out of. We can't hover around this positivity rate and not reopen forever. https://t.co/RYuU8m8ayc
@GiovanniToti @GenovAeroporto Più test, più risultati falsi. Non ha senso testare persone sane senza sintomi. https://t.co/f1Bt5iRxcQ
RT @Humble_Analysis: Hospital in England finds 44% of positive test results over one month were false positives. https://t.co/J1GjLsvFsq
RT @AndrewM13604354: @ClareCraigPath Addenbrooke’s paper indicates half of positives were false in their excellent lab under less pressured…
RT @allisonpearson: Our superb hospital is the first to prove half of Covid “cases” are false. @DrCKRobinson @toadmeister https://t.co/t8Oe…
RT @allisonpearson: Our superb hospital is the first to prove half of Covid “cases” are false. @DrCKRobinson @toadmeister https://t.co/t8Oe…
@mtaibbi Hard to put any faith in this map when the test being used can’t be trusted. https://t.co/3lARwneOgL
RT @Charlie21296715: @Niall_Boylan Here's an example of an excellent lab in the UK, performing high volumes of PCR tests. Half of the posi…
RT @tlowdon: Study finds 44% false positives with high testing rate in low prevalence population. FPs "cause unnecessary community isolati…
RT @pdubdev: Hospital study shows 44% of tests were false positives when retested. #scamdemic https://t.co/zo1cxmiKep
RT @allisonpearson: Our superb hospital is the first to prove half of Covid “cases” are false. @DrCKRobinson @toadmeister
@KingYanKwan Your link is media tripe. Does half of all ‘cases’ being proven to be false positives on re-testing not seem exceptionally high to you then? https://t.co/6o76BXODKT
Este estudo não teve o impacto que merece. Republico. Partilhem, isto é gigantesco. São dados reais de hospitais reais com pessoas reais. 44% de falsos positivos. Dados do Cambridge Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory. https://t.co/Y9TX9T1ST
Specificity and positive predictive value of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing in a low prevalence setting https://t.co/mPQdgZK9SK
@rep_genova Forse un giornalista vorrà fare un reportage obiettivo, dopo tutto. E scopri quali misure funzionano davvero e come l'Italia valuta i test https://t.co/f1Bt5iRxcQ
RT @AndrewM13604354: @ClareCraigPath Addenbrooke’s paper indicates half of positives were false in their excellent lab under less pressured…
RT @Pollemann1: @DaFeid @SHomburg @spasskultur Zum Glück 'nur' 44% Falsch-Positive hier: https://t.co/meM3aMJGMS 🤔🤪
RT @allisonpearson: Our superb hospital is the first to prove half of Covid “cases” are false. @DrCKRobinson @toadmeister
RT @tlowdon: Study finds 44% false positives with high testing rate in low prevalence population. FPs "cause unnecessary community isolati…
RT @foogatwo: Pretty close to my estimate of 30-50% false positives in NJ when I did this exercise back in Aug/Sept.
RT @_johnbye: UPDATE: thanks to a covid sceptic for sharing this study without reading it properly. By retesting 19,261 positive samples i…
RT @foogatwo: Pretty close to my estimate of 30-50% false positives in NJ when I did this exercise back in Aug/Sept.
RT @foogatwo: Pretty close to my estimate of 30-50% false positives in NJ when I did this exercise back in Aug/Sept.
RT @Humble_Analysis: Hospital in England finds 44% of positive test results over one month were false positives. https://t.co/J1GjLsvFsq
RT @tjschu: Evidence is piling up that the test numbers are overblown and unreliable. https://t.co/zUXNUg1hOE
RT @ronmantini: @cmentmixer @HumphreyPT @drdavidsamadi @realDonaldTrump About a 44% chance the test is wrong. Ask Nick Saban https://t.co/D…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Hospital in England finds 44% of positive test results over one month were false positives. https://t.co/J1GjLsvFsq
RT @allisonpearson: Our superb hospital is the first to prove half of Covid “cases” are false. @DrCKRobinson @toadmeister
RT @JckSki: @PBasiukiewicz i tylko te testy: tutaj 44% FAŁSZYWIE POZYTYWNYCH: https://t.co/53COn4GlK8 a tutaj 144/148 fałszywie pozytywn…
@HarperL75661966 @stephenpollard @allisonpearson Apologies, paper here https://t.co/zxROpt87ft