We need to educate, for sure. Millions think C*vid just disappeared. Millions don’t know they could kill their family & friends, or their kids could kill them (just 1 example). HCWs should be shouting about this
RT @BorzoiBystander: This is a long but important tweet (not a thread). Highly recommend.
RT @equibotanica: 🎯 "There has been a change of tone from some government agencies. People should pay greater attention ... because the ch…
RT @equibotanica: 🎯 "There has been a change of tone from some government agencies. People should pay greater attention ... because the ch…
RT @BorzoiBystander: This is a long but important tweet (not a thread). Highly recommend.
This is a long but important tweet (not a thread). Highly recommend.
🎯 "There has been a change of tone from some government agencies. People should pay greater attention ... because the change of messaging is happening against a backdrop of tremendous pressure not to harm the economy or concede mistakes were made in the i
@ID_Denmark @CapTopPicks @19joho @dr_jon_l Here's what those in the field actually said on infection-induced herd immunity: https://t.co/DSW2ZP9drx https://t.co/PGsnkMlHO5 https://t.co/5OftmZ8GXw https://t.co/yqetQqiReA https://t.co/4xXPxIq48A https://t.
RT @Themislv_vls: 🧵Dès le mois d’octobre 2020, 7000 scientifiques ont dénoncé cette stratégie dans le memorandum John Snow. https://t.co/JS…
RT @Themislv_vls: 🧵Dès le mois d’octobre 2020, 7000 scientifiques ont dénoncé cette stratégie dans le memorandum John Snow. https://t.co/JS…
RT @Themislv_vls: 🧵Dès le mois d’octobre 2020, 7000 scientifiques ont dénoncé cette stratégie dans le memorandum John Snow. https://t.co/JS…
RT @Themislv_vls: 🧵Dès le mois d’octobre 2020, 7000 scientifiques ont dénoncé cette stratégie dans le memorandum John Snow. https://t.co/JS…
🧵Dès le mois d’octobre 2020, 7000 scientifiques ont dénoncé cette stratégie dans le memorandum John Snow. https://t.co/JSv7m23er3
RT @MeckerMutti: "Jede Strategie zur Pandemiebewältigung, die auf der Immunität gegen natürliche Infektionen gegen COVID-19 beruht, ist feh…
"Jede Strategie zur Pandemiebewältigung, die auf der Immunität gegen natürliche Infektionen gegen COVID-19 beruht, ist fehlerhaft." 15.10.2020 https://t.co/Mp7vekqOnF
15.10.2020: https://t.co/PDGJYdv1hQ
@TheEliKlein @hholdenthorp @sciencecohen Isn’t this gonna be awkward for the John Snow propagandists? 😬 “Furthermore, there is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection” https://t.co/u1TtEGTqu7 https://t.co/ka
26/E One way to make things up is to 'quote mine' in a way that misrepresents the source the quote is from. The text surrounding the quote shows Highleyman quote mined the John Snow Memorandum. https://t.co/AuzNuyjZOg https://t.co/zt5Jk7da89 https://t.
@t1pnl @LizHighleyman @kevinnbass She's making it up. https://t.co/TUvqPd3lOQ
RT @million_meal: @Kevin_McKernan Devi Sridhar is an author on Lancet 2020. Real classy throwing her friends under the bus. The gold stand…
@Kevin_McKernan Devi Sridhar is an author on Lancet 2020. Real classy throwing her friends under the bus. The gold standard for a low IFR virus is herd immunity. Med students know this. These idiots called it "a dangerous fallacy unsupported by scientifi
RT @SourceControl21: 1/Smart reminder 👇 https://t.co/QZiIXzl1hE
RT @SourceControl21: 1/Smart reminder 👇 https://t.co/QZiIXzl1hE
RT @SourceControl21: 1/Smart reminder 👇 https://t.co/QZiIXzl1hE
RT @SourceControl21: 1/Smart reminder 👇 https://t.co/QZiIXzl1hE
1/Smart reminder 👇 https://t.co/QZiIXzl1hE
https://t.co/h7n1rLmLZv Skończyło się największą katastrofą polityki zdrowotnej w historii ludzkości. 2/
@MIGUELA71643080 De hecho, el estudio tira por tierra todas tus mentiras sobre el COVID. Gracias, no lo conocía y es genial😘 https://t.co/9rSKtEkYV2
@MIGUELA71643080 Micky, el artículo del que habla es éste 👇 y dice, justamente, lo contrario que tú interpretas. O no lo has leído o no sabes inglés (o mientes como un bellaco???🤣) https://t.co/9rSKtEkYV2
.@GYamey : Signatory of JSM https://t.co/KCBezFi8Ni which stipulated that we should not adopt GBD because it would lead to recurrent epidemics, while adopting JSM led to ... recurrent ... 🤔 https://t.co/D1TB4MAH9b
@GYamey Analysis of the Great Barrington Declaration. A ghastly proposed experiment! Anyone involved with it may be capable of anything. https://t.co/QxXkBMjXdV
@zoeharcombe @higgsri "Great Barrington Declaration" https://t.co/SxHnPdSMGc "Counter memorandum" https://t.co/EvMi2IuALN Lancet https://t.co/Yu4KB7S6Js NLM https://t.co/GokgIgmtrN https://t.co/GUsfkTfRkf
@lu_eder @Fionnindy @maithi_nk Virologie ("...die konsequentes und schnelles Handeln erforderlich macht."). > https://t.co/XAr4c2vLWN - im Lancet ("Scientific consensus [...]: we need to act now") > https://t.co/tfGNmAhW7R Das sind 3 sehr renommierte
RT @Med58ll: Gepubliceerd in The Lancet waar ze het idee om het virus te laten rondgaan om groepsimmuniteit te bereiken een “gevaarlijke mi…
RT @Med58ll: Gepubliceerd in The Lancet waar ze het idee om het virus te laten rondgaan om groepsimmuniteit te bereiken een “gevaarlijke mi…
RT @Med58ll: Gepubliceerd in The Lancet waar ze het idee om het virus te laten rondgaan om groepsimmuniteit te bereiken een “gevaarlijke mi…
RT @Med58ll: Gepubliceerd in The Lancet waar ze het idee om het virus te laten rondgaan om groepsimmuniteit te bereiken een “gevaarlijke mi…
Gepubliceerd in The Lancet waar ze het idee om het virus te laten rondgaan om groepsimmuniteit te bereiken een “gevaarlijke misvatting” noemen, die niet door wetenschappelijk bewijs wordt ondersteund. Het uitrazen kan leiden tot terugkerende epidemieën. ht
RT @oliverbeige: @PascalBerger17 @MonicaGandhi9 @TheLancet That's the Lancet article I was thinking o. Not to mince word, they should all g…
@PascalBerger17 @MonicaGandhi9 @TheLancet That's the Lancet article I was thinking o. Not to mince word, they should all get fired for scientific misconduct. https://t.co/4NwO4JPtbn https://t.co/o78qGIL3m9
RT @TheLancet: Read the full Correspondence “Scientific consensus on the #COVID19 pandemic: we need to act now” https://t.co/jajIaxbMwd
@cohelongo @WHO 3/ the old and ill people are not important and must be sacrified to maintain normal economic activity and benefices, because money is more important than the life of this minority. https://t.co/123JUNzMq4
@zcarbon58 @MatDeFleuriot @VikiLovesFACS @AlexBerenson The more important videos are here https://t.co/d3cpw3n3re The pandemic response was based on a worldwide medical consensus, there's no single institution that determined that https://t.co/RX9TKr1OPH
(Herd immunity) would not end the COVID-19 pandemic but result in recurrent epidemics, as was the case with numerous infectious diseases before the advent of vaccination. What recurrent, numerous infectious diseases are they referring to,..? https://t.
The John Snow Memo was published in The Lancet, October 15, 2020, in response to the Great Barrington Declaration https://t.co/0fQWHep4wZ
@Fynnderella1 @MdBreathe It's a member of the "paracetamol team" 🤦♂️ https://t.co/my7rip7y6p She co-authored the john snow memorandum requiring strict NPI based on flawed models... https://t.co/USGcPGjn1u What have we done to deserve such scientists ? 😭
@dgncl @dgurdasani1 Were gouvernements really "in power" when a few conflicted scientists auto-qualified as the "consensus" called for strict measures based on flawed modelling studies arguing natural elements can't influence an epidemic? https://t.co/USGc
RT @sudokuvariante: In October 2020, a few conflicted scientists claimed there was a consensus in favor of strict restrictions: https://t.c…
RT @sudokuvariante: In October 2020, a few conflicted scientists claimed there was a consensus in favor of strict restrictions: https://t.c…
In October 2020, a few conflicted scientists claimed there was a consensus in favor of strict restrictions: https://t.co/KCBezFi8Ni Among them @firefoxx66 and @EckerleIsabella. https://t.co/iHti15QIg9
RT @leseerlaubnis: Der Gegenspieler der Great Barrington Declaration war das John Snow Memorandum - getragen von breiter Front der Wissensc…
RT @leseerlaubnis: Der Gegenspieler der Great Barrington Declaration war das John Snow Memorandum - getragen von breiter Front der Wissensc…
RT @leseerlaubnis: Der Gegenspieler der Great Barrington Declaration war das John Snow Memorandum - getragen von breiter Front der Wissensc…
Der Gegenspieler der Great Barrington Declaration war das John Snow Memorandum - getragen von breiter Front der Wissenschaft und Medizin, aber eben nicht von den Multimilliardären. https://t.co/GtJpNqJGE9 https://t.co/nxMlqsxc1c
“Many, including Rochelle Walensky, now the CDC’s director, signed the John Snow memorandum in October 2020, which declared that “there is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection.” https://t.co/lBYXOoclpG htt
RT @TheLancet: Read the full Correspondence “Scientific consensus on the #COVID19 pandemic: we need to act now” https://t.co/jajIaxbMwd
RT @nikomer75: 13/ https://t.co/1qsFFCeWrX
RT @nikomer75: 13/ https://t.co/1qsFFCeWrX
RT @DennisR14485239: @agentsmart @blakandblack This is the only reference I found in the link below, don't know if there is a later version…
@agentsmart @blakandblack This is the only reference I found in the link below, don't know if there is a later version. The Lancet. "Any pandemic management strategy relying upon immunity from natural infections for COVID-19 is flawed" https://t.co/CCT
RT @sudokuvariante: @MartinFierro769 Le John Snow memo: https://t.co/KCBezFi8Ni Des modèles complètement foireux: https://t.co/EZtgnntygJ E…
@MartinFierro769 Le John Snow memo: https://t.co/KCBezFi8Ni Des modèles complètement foireux: https://t.co/EZtgnntygJ Etc... @TheLancet est une gazette relayant la pire propagande covidiste. Elle n'a plus rien de scientifique.
This article has aged terribly. How can scientific institutions recover from their herd-like, seemingly politically motivated behaviour? I would love @carlheneghan on @triggerpod to discuss @KonstantinKisin https://t.co/OQS869FuIH
@RepKatCammack @HouseCommerce Kat's still uber mad that more people didn't die as a result of embracing the Great Barrington Declaration which was rejected by the vast majority of scientists and doctors. https://t.co/VXs6Stu1lH https://t.co/cdeHloV3SC http
@Castdeath97 @jamesamcgee @LizHighleyman @kevinnbass @Newsweek @profvrr She claims the John Snow Memorandum says it, when it in fact does not. She simply doesn't understand the relevant immunology, unlike the experts she's offering a straw man of. https:/
@jamesamcgee @Castdeath97 @LizHighleyman @kevinnbass @Newsweek @profvrr She unambiguously made it up. That's why she's never able to give an example of it when people ask, despite people repeatedly giving her examples of numerous experts discussing infect
@mnnurse10 @LizHighleyman @kevinnbass @Newsweek Re: "You are making stuff up." Indeed she is. She's been called on it many times, yet never gives any evidence. So it's clearly being done in bad faith at this point. https://t.co/iKeZuLsMPV
@daveminyo @kevinnbass From the John Snow Memorandum, a sort of rebuttal to the Great Barrington Declaration: "...there is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection..." https://t.co/U4HzYuBNHE
@BenDo1979 @schroeder_k während Corona einfach alles falsch gemacht, was man beim Zusammenspiel v. Wissenschaft + Politik nur falsch machen konnte... 1. https://t.co/tfGNmAitXp 2. https://t.co/V4OxmipP5m 3. https://t.co/XAr4c2wjMl 3/3
Scientific consensus on the COVID-19 pandemic: we need to act now - The Lancet https://t.co/ara5dXrwIh
RT @TheLancet: Read the full Correspondence “Scientific consensus on the #COVID19 pandemic: we need to act now” https://t.co/jajIaxbMwd
@cjsnowdon These people – including Deepti, Devi and other ignorants – thought suppression was a success and "scientific consensus". "Any pandemic management strategy relying upon immunity from natural infections for COVID-19 is flawed." You can't say t
RT @leseerlaubnis: Wissenschaftler haben sich offen gegen die GBD gestellt. Schon im Oktober 2020 hatten sie klargestellt: - es gibt kein…
@Redkiraz (Trad) Plus de 80 chercheurs avertissent qu'une approche dite #herdimmunity de la gestion #COVID19 est "une erreur dangereuse non étayée par des preuves scientifiques" #WCPH2020 https://t.co/z4IN36kvtm
RT @TheLancet: Read the full Correspondence “Scientific consensus on the #COVID19 pandemic: we need to act now” https://t.co/jajIaxbMwd
RT @leseerlaubnis: Wissenschaftler haben sich offen gegen die GBD gestellt. Schon im Oktober 2020 hatten sie klargestellt: - es gibt kein…
RT @GuatamaSid: @leseerlaubnis Deswegen schon damals: https://t.co/7ryul27Weu https://t.co/tKqp7VRpj7 https://t.co/SbgSZHpozv
RT @leseerlaubnis: Wissenschaftler haben sich offen gegen die GBD gestellt. Schon im Oktober 2020 hatten sie klargestellt: - es gibt kein…
RT @leseerlaubnis: Wissenschaftler haben sich offen gegen die GBD gestellt. Schon im Oktober 2020 hatten sie klargestellt: - es gibt kein…
@wissensfan @MHouse87575162 @chluetge @HansOttoWagner1 hier https://t.co/tfGNmAitXp Es reicht das Lesen der Headline und wir sind wieder bei 1. > die Autoren verstehen auch hier metaethische Grundlagen nicht. Sie bedienen sich hier einem kleinen Zirkel
@leseerlaubnis Deswegen schon damals: https://t.co/7ryul27Weu https://t.co/tKqp7VRpj7 https://t.co/SbgSZHpozv
Allerede i 2020 har videnskabsfolk modsat sig ideen om flokimmunitet og det uetiske i, at ville isolere 30% sårbare i befolkningen. https://t.co/wtNN8lLBO8
RT @leseerlaubnis: Wissenschaftler haben sich offen gegen die GBD gestellt. Schon im Oktober 2020 hatten sie klargestellt: - es gibt kein…
RT @leseerlaubnis: Wissenschaftler haben sich offen gegen die GBD gestellt. Schon im Oktober 2020 hatten sie klargestellt: - es gibt kein…
RT @leseerlaubnis: Wissenschaftler haben sich offen gegen die GBD gestellt. Schon im Oktober 2020 hatten sie klargestellt: - es gibt kein…
RT @leseerlaubnis: Wissenschaftler haben sich offen gegen die GBD gestellt. Schon im Oktober 2020 hatten sie klargestellt: - es gibt kein…
RT @leseerlaubnis: Wissenschaftler haben sich offen gegen die GBD gestellt. Schon im Oktober 2020 hatten sie klargestellt: - es gibt kein…
RT @leseerlaubnis: Wissenschaftler haben sich offen gegen die GBD gestellt. Schon im Oktober 2020 hatten sie klargestellt: - es gibt kein…
Wissenschaftler haben sich offen gegen die GBD gestellt. Schon im Oktober 2020 hatten sie klargestellt: - es gibt keine Belege dafür, dass es Herdenimmunität geben könnte - Absondern von 30 % der Bevölkerung als Vulnerable ist hochgradig unethisch (s.u.)
RT @TheLancet: Read the full Correspondence “Scientific consensus on the #COVID19 pandemic: we need to act now” https://t.co/jajIaxbMwd