↓ Skip to main content

Young Children Consider Merit when Sharing Resources with Others

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Young Children Consider Merit when Sharing Resources with Others
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0043979
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Kanngiesser, Felix Warneken

Abstract

MERIT IS A KEY PRINCIPLE OF FAIRNESS: rewards should be distributed according to how much someone contributed to a task. Previous research suggests that children have an early ability to take merit into account in third-party situations but that merit-based sharing in first-party contexts does not emerge until school-age. Here we provide evidence that three- and five-year-old children already use merit to share resources with others, even when sharing is costly for the child. In Study 1, a child and a puppet-partner collected coins that were later exchanged for rewards. We varied the work-contribution of both partners by manipulating how many coins each partner collected. Children kept fewer stickers in trials in which they had contributed less than in trials in which they had contributed more than the partner, showing that they took merit into account. Few children, however, gave away more than half of the stickers when the partner had worked more. Study 2 confirmed that children related their own work-contribution to their partner's, rather than simply focusing on their own contribution. Taken together, these studies show that merit-based sharing is apparent in young children; however it remains constrained by a self-serving bias.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 188 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 23%
Student > Master 30 15%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 116 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 39 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#991,232
of 24,988,543 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,908
of 216,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,255
of 177,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#191
of 4,364 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,988,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,364 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.