You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dietary Factors Associated with Dental Erosion: A Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0042626 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Haifeng Li, Yan Zou, Gangqiang Ding |
Abstract |
Some diet factors are risk factors for dental erosion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 4 | 20% |
United States | 2 | 10% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 90% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 191 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
Researcher | 11 | 6% |
Other | 30 | 16% |
Unknown | 61 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 41% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Unknown | 68 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,177,345
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,874
of 225,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,595
of 188,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#229
of 4,380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.