↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Factors Associated with Dental Erosion: A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary Factors Associated with Dental Erosion: A Meta-Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042626
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haifeng Li, Yan Zou, Gangqiang Ding

Abstract

Some diet factors are risk factors for dental erosion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 191 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 17%
Student > Postgraduate 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Researcher 11 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 61 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 68 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,177,345
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,874
of 225,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,595
of 188,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#229
of 4,380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.