↓ Skip to main content

The Systemic Turn and Participatory Budgeting: The Case of Rio Grande do Sul

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Latin American Studies, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Systemic Turn and Participatory Budgeting: The Case of Rio Grande do Sul
Published in
Journal of Latin American Studies, October 2020
DOI 10.1017/s0022216x20000954
Authors

Sveinung Legard, Benjamin Goldfrank

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 50%
Other 1 25%
Professor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 75%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2020.
All research outputs
#10,632,221
of 16,614,363 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Latin American Studies
#333
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,224
of 321,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Latin American Studies
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,614,363 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.