Report for: Blood sugar level follows perceived time rather than actual time in people with type 2 diabetes

Title	Blood sugar level follows perceived time rather than actual time in people with type 2 diabetes
Published in	Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2016
DOI	10.1073/pnas.1603444113
Pubmed ID	27382161
Authors	Chanmo Park, Francesco Pagnini, Andrew Reece, Deborah Phillips, Ellen Langer
Abstract	The current study investigates whether perceived time has an effect on blood glucose level in people with type 2 diabetes. The hypothesis is that perceived time will have a greater influence over blood glucose level than actual time. Changes in blood glucose levels were measured in 46 participants with diabetes while they completed simple tasks during a 90-min period. Participants' perception of time was manipulated by having them refer to clocks that were either accurate or altered to run fast or slow. Blood glucose levels changed in accordance with how much time they believed had passed instead of how much time had actually passed. These results are an example of the influence psychological processes can directly exert on the body.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United States	15	21%
United Kingdom	10	14%
Canada	3	4%
Australia	3	4%
France	2	3%
Spain	2	3%
Saudi Arabia	1	1%
Nepal	1	1%
Switzerland	1	1%
Other	5	7%
Unknown	29	40%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	49	68%
Scientists	18	25%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	3	4%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	2	3%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Sweden	1	2%
Germany	1	2%
Luxembourg	1	2%
Unknown	54	95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Ph. D. Student	20	35%
Researcher	11	19%
Other	6	11%
Student > Bachelor	4	7%
Student > Master	4	7%
Other	9	16%
Unknown	3	5%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Psychology	15	26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	7	12%
Nursing and Health Professions	6	11%
Neuroscience	5	9%
Medicine and Dentistry	5	9%
Other	12	21%
Unknown	7	12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.

All research outputs

#203,389

of 15,375,002 outputs

Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

#4,417

of 84,949 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#6,307

of 262,997 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

#151

of 880 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 15,375,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 84,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 880 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.

Blood sugar level follows perceived time rather than actual time in people with type 2 diabetes

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context