↓ Skip to main content

Eurasian Tree Sparrows, Risk for H5N1 Virus Spread and Human Contamination through Buddhist Ritual: An Experimental Approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eurasian Tree Sparrows, Risk for H5N1 Virus Spread and Human Contamination through Buddhist Ritual: An Experimental Approach
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028609
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramona Alikiiteaga Gutiérrez, San Sorn, John M. Nicholls, Philippe Buchy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 18%
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Environmental Science 5 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#15,461,854
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#136,901
of 225,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,607
of 248,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,429
of 2,780 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,780 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.