↓ Skip to main content

Atualização das Diretrizes Brasileiras de Valvopatias – 2020

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atualização das Diretrizes Brasileiras de Valvopatias – 2020
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, October 2020
DOI 10.36660/abc.20201047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flavio Tarasoutchi, Marcelo Westerlund Montera, Auristela Isabel de Oliveira Ramos, Roney Orismar Sampaio, Vitor Emer Egypto Rosa, Tarso Augusto Duenhas Accorsi, Antonio de Santis, João Ricardo Cordeiro Fernandes, Lucas José Tachotti Pires, Guilherme S. Spina, Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira, Paulo de Lara Lavitola, Walkiria Samuel Ávila, Milena Ribeiro Paixão, Tiago Bignoto, Dorival Júlio Della Togna, Evandro Tinoco Mesquita, William Antônio de Magalhães Esteves, Fernando Atik, Alexandre Siciliano Colafranceschi, Valdir Ambrósio Moises, Alberto Takeshi Kiyose, Pablo M. A. Pomerantzeff, Pedro A. Lemos, Fabio Sandoli de Brito, Clara Weksler, Carlos Manuel de Almeida Brandão, Robinson Poffo, Ricardo Simões, Salvador Rassi, Paulo Ernesto Leães, Ricardo Mourilhe-Rocha, José Luiz Barros Pena, Fabio Biscegli Jatene, Márcia de Melo Barbosa, Alexandre Abizaid, Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro, Fernando Bacal, Carlos Eduardo Rochitte, José Honório de Almeida Palma da Fonseca, Samira Kaissar Nasr Ghorayeb, Marcelo Antonio Cartaxo Queiroga Lopes, Salvador Vicente Spina, Ricardo H. Pignatelli, José Francisco Kerr Saraiva

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Other 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Unspecified 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 22 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Unspecified 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Unknown 23 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#13,248,658
of 22,601,066 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#261
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,077
of 336,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,601,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.