↓ Skip to main content

Relief of pain due to uterine cramping/involution after birth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relief of pain due to uterine cramping/involution after birth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004908.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea R Deussen, Pat Ashwood, Ruth Martis, Fiona Stewart, Luke E Grzeskowiak

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 31%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,015,316
of 16,652,557 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,734
of 11,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,805
of 380,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,652,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.