↓ Skip to main content

From present to future development pathways in fragile mountain landscapes

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Policy, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From present to future development pathways in fragile mountain landscapes
Published in
Environmental Science & Policy, December 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.016
Authors

Timos Karpouzoglou, Art Dewulf, Katya Perez, Praju Gurung, Santosh Regmi, Aiganysh Isaeva, Marc Foggin, Johan Bastiaensen, Gert Van Hecken, Zed Zulkafli, Feng Mao, Julian Clark, David M. Hannah, Prem Sagar Chapagain, Wouter Buytaert, Katarzyna Cieslik

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Lecturer 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 24 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 17%
Environmental Science 11 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 7%
Engineering 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,419,513
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Policy
#564
of 2,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,927
of 518,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Policy
#18
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.