↓ Skip to main content

The Evolution of Robust Development and Homeostasis in Artificial Organisms

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Evolution of Robust Development and Homeostasis in Artificial Organisms
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000030
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Basanta, Mark Miodownik, Buzz Baum

Abstract

During embryogenesis, multicellular animals are shaped via cell proliferation, cell rearrangement, and apoptosis. At the end of development, tissue architecture is then maintained through balanced rates of cell proliferation and loss. Here, we take an in silico approach to look for generic systems features of morphogenesis in multicellular animals that arise as a consequence of the evolution of development. Using artificial evolution, we evolved cellular automata-based digital organisms that have distinct embryonic and homeostatic phases of development. Although these evolved organisms use a variety of strategies to maintain their form over time, organisms of different types were all found to rapidly recover from environmental damage in the form of wounds. This regenerative response was most robust in an organism with a stratified tissue-like architecture. An evolutionary analysis revealed that evolution itself contributed to the ability of this organism to maintain its form in the face of genetic and environmental perturbation, confirming the results of previous studies. In addition, the exceptional robustness of this organism to surface injury was found to result from an upward flux of cells, driven in part by cell divisions with a stable niche at the tissue base. Given the general nature of the model, our results lead us to suggest that many of the robust systems properties observed in real organisms, including scar-free wound-healing in well-protected embryos and the layered tissue architecture of regenerating epithelial tissues, may be by-products of the evolution of morphogenesis, rather than the direct result of selection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 3 3%
Switzerland 2 2%
New Zealand 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 91 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 34%
Computer Science 19 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 11%
Physics and Astronomy 7 6%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,941,873
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,697
of 9,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,963
of 95,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.