↓ Skip to main content

Assessments of different inactivating reagents in formulating transmissible gastroenteritis virus vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Assessments of different inactivating reagents in formulating transmissible gastroenteritis virus vaccine
Published in
Virology Journal, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12985-020-01433-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fujie Zhao, Lintao Liu, Menglong Xu, Xiangli Shu, Lanlan Zheng, Zhanyong Wei

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 27%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2020.
All research outputs
#17,838,975
of 22,062,456 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#2,363
of 2,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,590
of 399,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#130
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,062,456 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.